Is Spider-Man the alternative to law-enforcement socialism?
Let’s not forget Jeffrey Tucker’s take on Spider-Man 2: “A Class Act”
| ![]() |
Let’s not forget Jeffrey Tucker’s take on Spider-Man 2: “A Class Act”
| ![]() |
So far in this book, we have developed a theory of liberty and property rights, and have outlined the legal code that would be necessary to defend those rights. What of government, the State? What is its proper role, if any?
Most people, including most political theorists, believe that once one concedes the importance, or even the vital necessity, of some particular activity of the State—such as the provision of a legal code—that one has ipso facto conceded the necessity of the State itself.
The 2008 presidential campaign has been going on for months, even though we are far from the end of 2007. But all that really gets discussed are the horserace details — who is ahead, who is raising more money, how badly will a particular scandal or issue hurt a candidate, etc. Unfortunately, that approach, which dominates the media, is a horribly inadequate way to go about selecting the person who will fill America’s highest constitutional office.
Microsoft takes on the free world reports: “Microsoft claims that free software like Linux, which runs a big chunk of corporate America, violates 235 of its patents. It wants royalties from distributors and users.” None of this is surprising; this is the predictable outcome of having state-granted monopolies on information (patents and copyrights).
[Cross posted at Organizations and Markets]
The student loan scandal concerns the fact that many colleges and universities chose preferred lenders for financing student loans and then received remuneration for their recommendations from the lenders. The scandal has been going on since mid-March. Thus, it is startling to learn that it was not until April 30 that any evidence was provided concerning how anyone might have been harmed by the practice.