Isn’t the Capital Surplus a Good Thing?
One of the strongest arguments in defense of large US trade deficits1 is to point out that they are the accounting flip side of a net capital inflow to the United States. This is quite effective rhetorically.
One of the strongest arguments in defense of large US trade deficits1 is to point out that they are the accounting flip side of a net capital inflow to the United States. This is quite effective rhetorically.
Most Americans say that understanding our founding is very important. However, we actually pay almost no attention to it, leaving us woefully unaware of many critical aspects of our heritage.
I find this book intriguing. First, I’m embarrassed to admit that I’ve never read it, or even heard of it until recently. Second, I don’t know who the author is, though she studied with Roepke and otherwise offers a massive bibliography, and is clearly an outstanding scholar. If anyone knows, please post.
Why does it always have to be California? New York? Massachusetts?
Why not New Hampshire?
New Hampshire: The Land of “Live Free or Die: Death is not the worst of evils.”
The home of Daniel Webster, Horace Greeley, Mary Baker Eddy, Franklin Pierce, Robert Frost, Maxfield Parrish, Alan B. Shepard Jr, J.D. Salinger, Ken Burns, and Dean Kamen.
My article “Shareholder, not Stakeholder,” which argued against the collectivist notion of “the stakeholder,” brought forth much disagreement, especially from the bohemian business types. Regarding this same topic, there is this magnificent Norman Barry piece on the stakeholder fallacy in the Freeman. He notes:
[Written in 1925, this essay was published in Economica in 1926 and became more widely known when F.A. Hayek included it in Capitalism and the Historians (1954).]