Scrupulosity and the Condemnation of Every Existing Business

There’s a growing moral scrupulosity going on in libertarian land, to the point that every really existing business is closely examined for any hint of state involvement (sin!), even when one stage removed (sin!), and then, upon discovery, condemned to hell has yet another example of the terrible things that the state does to the world. How does this work? If you defend WalMart – an amazing company that provides for the world – the scrupulous will cite how it thrives off public road access.

Sour Grapes: Politicians launch scorched earth campaign against own city in bid to raise taxes

It turns our that after the voters of Colorado Springs rejected a tax increase for the city, the city’s politicians ordered their public relations staffers to bad mouth the city and to cast a negative light on the city in national media. Basically, since they didn’t get their tax increase, the politicians were determined to make the city look as lousy as possible in a sort of I-told-you-so campaign that would make the voters sorry for not submitting to their betters.

The Hate Litmus

The angrier-than-thou “moral scrupulosity” among some libertarians that Jeffrey Tucker talks about in his excellent recent post seems to be part of something a bit broader. As a commenter on Jonathan Catalan’s blog post seconding Jeffrey’s sentiments said, there can be a tendency for libertarians to be “willful grumps”.

Economics, Left-Liberalism, and Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism

John Tomasi is guest-blogging for Bleeding-Heart Libertarians on a research agenda for bleeding-heart libertarians. His latest entry continues his “frozen waters” metaphor and describes “Ships of the BHL Line.” He points out that a lot of bleeding-heart libertarians and 20th century liberals share many of the same values–a commitment to the betterment of the lives of the poor, for example.