The Political Sociology of Freedom: Adam Ferguson and F.A. Hayek, by Ronald Hamowy

Mises Review 12, No. 3 (Fall 2006)

The Real Meaning of Hayek

THE POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY OF FREEDOM: ADAM FERGUSON AND F.A. HAYEK
Ronald Hamowy
Edward Elgar, 2005, xviii + 265 pgs.


Ronald Hamowy combines extraordinary critical powers with painstaking historical research. His skills are much in evidence in this collection of his essays, but I have an additional reason to call this book to my readers’ attention. On a few occasions, people have complained that my reviews are too negative.

Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation, by Leora Batnitzky and Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem, by Heinrich Meier

What did Leo Strauss Believe About Politics?

Mises Review 12, No. 3 (Fall 2006)

LEO STRAUSS AND EMMANUEL LEVINAS: PHILOSOPHY AND THE POLITICS OF REVELATION
Leora Batnitzky
Cambridge University Press, 2006, xxii + 280 pgs.

LEO STRAUSS AND THE THEOLOGICO-POLITICAL PROBLEM
Heinrich Meier
Cambridge University Press, 2006, xxi + 183 pgs.
 

Markets Don’t Fail!, by Brian Simpson

The Myth of Market Failure

Mises Review 12, No. 3, (Fall 2006)

MARKETS DON’T FAIL!
Brian Simpson
Lexington Books, 2005, xi + 221 pgs.
 

Few opponents of the free market today support the replacement of capitalism by socialism. Even anti-capitalists have learned something from the collapse of the Soviet bloc. Instead, it is alleged that capitalism, though a good system, is imperfect. The state must act to “improve” the situation.

Americanism: The Fourth Great Western Religion, by David Gelernter

Mises Review 13, No. 2 (Summer 2007)

AMERICANISM: THE FOURTH GREAT WESTERN RELIGION
David Gelernter
Doubleday, 2007, x + 229 pgs.


David Gelernter starts with an undoubted fact and uses it to construct a bizarre fantasy. The origins of America have been profoundly religious; in particular, the Puritans affected American thought in pervasive fashion. Their influence long persisted their demise as a distinct movement in the nineteenth century. Thus, historians who view the Founding Fathers as creatures of a secular Enlightenment are badly mistaken.