Economic Science and Neoclassicism
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
We have tried to take Caplan to task for his many errors of omission and commission. Nevertheless, we think his was a very worthwhile article. Why? First, its quality. As a critique of Austrianism it far surpasses many of the others cited above, and is easily in the class of Nozick (1977), which we certainly mean as high praise.A Pre-History of Misesian Calculation: The Contribution of Adolphe Thiers
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
Review of “The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law” by Randy E. Barnett
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
Uncertainty in Economic Thought edited by Christian Schmidt
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
In this article, we will attempt to demonstrate that the Austrian method of dealing with both theory and history is informed by its perspective on uncertainty as the core concept uniting the various characterizations of Austrian thought. Furthermore, we will argue that the Austrian School, among modern schools of thought, possesses the most realistic perspective on uncertainty and its role in the functioning of the economic system.
Monopolistic Competition and Macroeconomic Theory by Robert Solow
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
To Serve and Protect: Privatization and Community in Criminal Justice by Bruce L. Benson
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
The Political Economy of the New Deal, by Jim F. Couch and William F. Shughart II
Volume 2, No. 4 (Winter 1999)
Human Action and Socially-Optimal Conservation: A Misesian Inquiry into the Hotelling Principle
Volume 3, No. 1 (Spring 2000)
The Equations of Mathematical Economics and the Problem of Economic Calculation in a Socialist State
Volume 3, No. 1 (Spring 2000)
[EDITOR’S NOTE: Ludwig von Mises published a French language version of this paper, translated from German by Gaston Leduc, in Revue d’économie politique in 1938 (97, no. 6:899–906). Mises himself wrote this English language version which was previously unpublished. In this article, he discusses the different elements of the case against using mathematical equations to solve the problem of economic calculation in socialism that were advanced by himself and F.A. Hayek.
