Airplanes and Property Protection
Once again, we are back to trusting the government to protect us, even at a time when property owners are begging for the right to provide their own protection.
Once again, we are back to trusting the government to protect us, even at a time when property owners are begging for the right to provide their own protection.
While not quite Keynesian pyramids or payments to farmers to plow up their surplus crops, this is still, sadly, yet another New Deal in the making.
It is no surprise that in our current crisis we see economic fallacies calling for "temporary" government interventions in the economy popping up like mushrooms after a rain.
No institution has a greater incentive to increase airline security than the airlines themselves, who have both property and paying customers to protect.
In a usual wartime situation, the government massively expands and then falls back only partially after it is over. The present circumstances, however, are even worse than wartime.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development says it wants to eliminate tax havens because their practices are harmful, if not criminal. What it really wants is to eliminate tax competition.
Alan Bock's book, Waiting to Inhale, gives readers an inside look at the forces behind the movement to give medical patients access to the legal use of marijuana.
CNET's Executive Editor David Coursey claims that we can head off future government intervention if we only do what is needed today.
Vigilance about co-opted semantics is vital because language mediates thoughts, actions, and hence public debate and policy.
Regulators and their political backers believe that only government can protect people from the risks of everyday life. Adam Young explains.