emphasis on its contribution to the 2008 crisis and then suggests an alternative policy which, had it been in place would have dampened the most recent boom and bust. on the 2008 crisis points to different perpetrators, from flawed financial innovations such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) to weak regulations, from as long as it is the natural consequence of improvements, such as technological innovation, from which lower production costs are a beneficial byproduct. Conclusions
Concrete Economics: The Hamilton Approach to Economic Growth and Policy Stephen S. Cohen and J. Bradford DeLong Harvard Business Press Review, 2016 xi United States. From its very beginning, the United States again and again enacted policies to shift its economy onto a new growth direction. These redirections have
have risen to great prominence. This holds true in particular for monetary policy experts, who are at great pains to advertise a variety of policy measures as while unconventional might suggest something along the lines of “courageous” and “innovative” action. Using the expression “aggressive monetary policy” works in the of policy measures; and that knowledge is clearly needed to resist damaging policies. Perpetual use of confused language may result in social outcomes that few
Free Market 17, no. 3 (March 1999) Duality is the Visa and MasterCard management policy that allows banks doing business with one to issue both credit cards. It is a that duality is strangling the card marketplace, hurting consumers, and killing innovation. It was not always thus. The potential absence of duality was the basis of
stuck in a setup that it could not escape from. According to Hansen technological innovations had come to an end and population growth was stagnating. Hence, likely to remain in a permanent stagnation over a prolonged period unless fiscal policy is implemented to boost investment via public works projects. In this way of the economy on a trajectory of strong economic growth. But all that these loose policies are going to do is set in motion a further diversion of real savings from
the Fed has just been there to assist the US regime in implementing a variety of policies. It Can’t Go Bankrupt In spite of its record, the Fed continues to keep up it would be closed because it is already deeply economically insolvent.” Yet “‘Innovations’ in accounting policies adopted by the Federal Reserve Board in 2011
The book is animated by a controlling vision. A successful economy depends on innovative entrepreneurs who are willing to take large risks in return for the chance migrates to talented entrepreneurs eager to pursue profitable opportunities. Innovations like the automobile, computer, and online retail services destroy jobs, though, he makes what seems to me an incorrect claim; but fortunately, his main policy prescription can be restated in a better way. Tamny rightly calls for sound
propose “solutions” which reflect a presumption that they know what the proper Fed policy is for whatever economic problems they see. Unfortunately, not only might or incomplete, or both, but there is a huge gap between identifying monetary policy issues and knowing the right answers to them — between Fed snipers and Fed the necessity, timing, magnitude, and mechanisms of policy changes (including innovations, such as the introduction on interest payments on bank reserves and their
importance of the subject — and the possible collateral damage of pro-inflation policies — that few seem to bother to ask the deeper, fundamental question: does the should also be absent from every international comparison of economies in terms of innovation. Instead, Japan features at least in the top 5 of every ranking of the
hole in the bank’s accounts would not have existed if not for ultra-loose monetary policy. Let me explain why. As of December 31, 2022, Silicon Valley Bank had of unprofitable tech and the allegedly unstoppable flow of capital to fund innovation and green investments would never have happened without negative real
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.