arrangements. The editors assert that a country’s exchange rate is a matter of policy. Governments “use exchange rates to manipulate trade flow.” Devaluations are chosen by governments, or forced on them by the IMF, to make their exports more competitive in world markets thereby stimulating foreign demand for their exports. current international monetary regime, countries maintain discretion over monetary policy behind the veil of promises to maintain relatively fixed exchange rates
we’re told, are the very foundation of the economy and thus cannot be subject to competitive pressure or to changes in consumer demand. Butchers and bakers can go This agitation led to congressional enactment of more and more centralized policies, culminating in passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Modeled after Interstate Commerce Commission—the Fed eliminated “cutthroat” banking competition, often denounced as “wildcat banking.” This way the larger more
illegitimately monopolize the function of judging disputes. As soon as social competition in judging and enforcing the law is eliminated, the price of these rises and their quality falls. Only competition among states remains to provide a competitive check on the state’s predation. If one state plunders too heavily,
1980s. That country, economically speaking, appeared to have it all: an industrial policy that knew good and bad investments before markets themselves did, a Banks lend beyond the sum available from private savings, while central bank policy artificially pushes the rate of interest below its market level. Enticed by central banking and fractional-reserve banks. A pure gold standard and truly competitive banking would take their place. The Japanese case shows why anything
The fascist system, wrote Mises, “clung first to the same principles of economic policies which all not outright socialist governments have adopted in our day, expansion would determine the supply of capital funding and fiscal and regulatory policy would socialize the investment of capital. In an open letter to President and distribution of a given production put forth under conditions of free competition and a large degree of laissez-faire. State control of money, credit,
subsidies to companies to maintain employment and protect them from international competition. Nor were today’s critics of cronyism pointing to the “Asian Tigers” checkable deposits are liquidated. Bankruptcy is made much more likely by the policy of fractional reserves. The checkable-deposit liabilities built up during the
subsidies to companies to maintain employment and protect them from international competition. Nor were today’s critics of cronyism pointing to the “Asian Tigers” checkable deposits are liquidated. Bankruptcy is made much more likely by the policy of fractional reserves. The checkable-deposit liabilities built up during the
are more important than those on general theory, or the general problems of policy....” Knight also related an assessment by Oscar Lange, who he had asked to also eliminated. As a smaller matter, for later editions, the section on imperfect competition was changed from the 1949 edition, and not with clarifying results. For
if you repeal a regulation, some producers are harmed because they face increased competition and others are benefited because they are allowed to compete. The answer AEN: Given that Austrian economics doesn’t necessarily prescribe particular policy conclusions, why are most all Austrians also free-market economists? HERBENER
distinctive characteristic of the Western legal tradition is the coexistence and competition within the same community of diverse jurisdictions and diverse legal Lapstras, and Lawrence White have shown, the 100 years of Federal Reserve monetary policy have resulted in more economic and financial instability than under the
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.