around. But is it really more dangerous to elect a president who makes up economic policy on the fly than one who proclaims to have a detailed plan for us? The answer of which are impossible to predict. Furthermore, central planning shuts down innovation and the entrepreneurial process because it assumes to know today what is
or so. The advent of the Internet, for one, has changed the world forever. These innovations have been the product of market forces, the result of entrepreneurial of whether such a world is technically possible.” The speed of technological innovation has led to erosion of democratic and civic culture and an increasingly
, the order itself stems from the same issues that constantly plague government policies : inefficient, ineffective, and entirely dismissive of individual rights. Of motivation for enacting immigration laws is to further genuine compelling foreign policy goals, the laws will be upheld. But when the government’s motivation is to a lack of properly trained American labor . Considering how much technological innovation improves our day-to-day life, it is no exaggeration to suggest that making
at our Austrian Economics Research Conference, Hastings outlined how technological innovation is already making centralized “designed” systems obsolete, and how McMaken Mises Contra Marx by David Gordon 7 Steps Toward a More Sensible Foreign Policy by Patrick Barron Economic Wisdom From Harvard by Hunter Lewis How Central
American companies, but now everyone has gotten in on the act, which is one reason innovation and prices continue to improve. In particular, South Korea hosts Hynix Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the National Center for Policy Analysis, National Review , and many other organizations and “free market”
superior products and marketing strategies from harming rivals, but since every innovation that benefits consumers takes business away from rivals, halting such any need to prove such harm. Implicit in the precedent was the belief that such a policy must necessarily reflect an abusive use of monopoly power. Antitrust and
Mises Wire contributor, joined Jeff to discuss the ramifications of such a policy. With a growing chorus of mainstream economists calling for it, including articles from this past week’s Mises Daily and Mises Wire : How to Reverse the Innovation Slowdown by Peter St. Onge Why Negative Interest Rates Will Fail by Frank
spilled over from the protest groups. The War on Poverty was a Johnson welfare policy. The Food Stamp program grew quickly. Head Start was tried in the schools. laws like Truth in Lending and Product Safety Act had the effect of reducing innovation and raising costs. Environmental Impact Statements stopped projects across
telecommunications that came about during the 1980s. In fact, for many of these innovations, from Ted Turner’s Cable News Network, founded in 1980, to the advent of to Drexel, Jeff Scott said, In general, established business interests do not like innovations that undermine their competitive position. It is well documented that the worse, after Alan Greenspan became chairman of the Fed in 1987, the government’s policy of creating and expanding moral hazard became even more pronounced. First,
of the developing world, de-globalization, a world depression, and police-state policies at home. President Bush is under great Republican pressure to bomb other growth in America. The boom of the last years came in part from technological innovations and the worldwide market for American goods and services. All this may apparent... The plight of Iraqis.forced rulers to distance themselves from U.S policy... Pictures of rock-throwing Palestinian youths killed by sophisticated
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.