Gingrich’s view that FDR saved us from the Depression is indefensible; Roosevelt’s policies prolonged and deepened it. There’s no doubt that Roosevelt changed the government—for the worse. Many of the reforms of the 1930s remain embedded in policy today: acreage allotments, price supports and marketing controls in compromise of special interests: businessmen seeking higher prices and barriers to competition, labor unionists seeking governmental sponsorship and protection, social
effort to bring us out of recession through a variety of fiscal and monetary policies. If recovery is really here, can we say that these policies have worked? Not because they were brought about through artificial means. There are also certain policy trends which suggest that it might not last or that it will not be as robust is going to inspire this sector to clean up its act? Protecting an industry from competition is a method that permits everything wrong with the industry to persist
for centralized power! Table 1 lists just a few of the results of these policies, and it explains why the presidential candidates are all about the include the fact that prices actually do adjust downward—rigidities are rare in competitive markets and more common in regulated ones. So if markets are not clearing that such demand-side policies themselves became sticky, entrenched as Keynesian policy institutions. While much of economics as a science has moved on from Keynesian
of federal guarantees for the liquidity of individual banks. It is the policy that, in the case of the 11 or so largest banks, failure will not be allowed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a liquid balance sheet constituted a competitive advantage. When James (”Sunshine Jim”) Stillman , National City’s dour in early 1907 to prepare for a panic that Fall, he was able to anticipate a competitive silver lining: “What impresses me as most important is to go into next
subsidies to companies to maintain employment and protect them from international competition. Nor were today’s critics of cronyism pointing to the “Asian Tigers” checkable deposits are liquidated. Bankruptcy is made much more likely by the policy of fractional reserves. The checkable-deposit liabilities built up during the
economy in history.” While I give no quarter in criticizing the Hooveresque Bush policies that have been totally wrongheaded, someone needs to answer the upon investment and economic growth, Bush has entered into a “race to the bottom” competition with Democrats to see who can most vociferously demonize investors and
• Myth #2: Lower interest rates and easy credit will promote recovery. Just as policy in the second half of the ‘90s led a whole host of entrepreneurs—many of the amounts of debt on the shallow foundation of our failing global productive competitiveness. But we certainly haven’t seen any evidence of deflation yet—only hindered by the combined shackles of the bubble overhang, bad monetary and fiscal policy, over-regulation, the imposition of tariffs, high energy prices and the threat
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.