Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

Dimensions and Economics: Some Answers

The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Downloads

 

Volume 8, No. 4 (Winter 2005)

 

William Barnett’s critique of mathematics in economic analysis, “Dimensions and Economics: Some Problems,” claims that economics almost always uses functions and equations without paying any attention to their variable and parameter dimensions and units. By casual observation, that criticism appears often to be true, and it applies not only to functions and equations but also to relations of all sorts, including inequalities. Following his introduction, Barnett makes his main case in three sections, using two different examples: The Cobb-Douglas production function, whose parameters he sees as having (1) “meaningless or economically unreasonable dimensions” and (2) “inconstant” dimensions. A macroeconomic model, whose technology (production) function’s parameters.  he sees as either (3) “meaningless,” or else as defining a function that relates output hours to labor input hours, which yields “no net production.” Either way, the model is “not defensible.”

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Folsom, Roger Nils and Rodolfo Alejo Gonzalez. "Dimensions and Economics: Some Answers." The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8, No. 4 (Winter 2005): 45–65.

All Rights Reserved ©
Support Liberty

The Mises Institute exists solely on voluntary contributions from readers like you. Support our students and faculty in their work for Austrian economics, freedom, and peace.

Donate today
Group photo of Mises staff and fellows