The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Tax Cuts, "Trickle-Down"Economics, & Graph Refutation.

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 7 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
163 Posts
Points 5,275
Dustin Jussila posted on Thu, Jul 7 2011 11:26 PM

 - Many left-leaning people that argue that tax cuts aren't the best policy for the economy employ graphs, similar to the one's above, that highlights a negative correlation between tax rates and economic preformance (whether it be job creation or wages). If at all, how are these graphs, and ones like them, misleadleading and what is the best way to refute them?    

....brains.....free markets....brains....

All Replies

Top 150 Contributor
533 Posts
Points 8,445

Let's think about this. How would higher taxes lead to more jobs? Well, it might lead to more government jobs. But what logical connection is there between high taxes and higher employment?

Tumblr The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants. ~Albert Camus
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,439 Posts
Points 44,650

At last those coming came and they never looked back With blinding stars in their eyes but all they saw was black...
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
533 Posts
Points 8,445

Also, this is a really sick mentality that leftists have. If we stop robbing someone and it doesn't benefit someone else, then we shouldn't stop robbing that person.

Tumblr The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants. ~Albert Camus
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
36 Posts
Points 495
Kaiser replied on Fri, Jul 8 2011 12:51 AM

If we're talking simply about employment, this is all you need:

Employment-Population Ratio

http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet 

  

Nevertheless, there are so many problems with breaking up economic data into "top tax rate eras."

"I know that it is a hopeless undertaking to debate about fundamental value judgments."-Albert Einstein

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135

Kaiser:
Nevertheless, there are so many problems with breaking up economic data into "top tax rate eras."

On that note...

 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
3,113 Posts
Points 60,515

Low taxes don't "create jobs" and high taxes don't "destroy jobs." Involuntary unemployment is caused by either endogenous/exogenous wage rigidity, or structural imbalances. The idea that lower taxes will somehow lower the unemployment rate is a myth. At the same time, though, lowering taxes will indeed have stimulating effects as it allows individuals to keep and therefore invest/consume a higher portion of their income (rather than having it confiscated by the government), and reducing capital gains taxes, for example, will increase investment (and reducing consumption taxes will obviously increase consumption, etc, etc).

There may be a relationship between payroll taxes and employment though.

"If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion."

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap