of Annapolis. Killing the Elderly Secrecy and hypocrisy have permeated covid policies across the nation. Maryland is busy hiring a thousand “contact tracers” to nursing homes to accept covid patients, will have no legal culpability for a policy that contributed to more than five thousand nursing home deaths in his state. had been detected in America, the Food and Drug Administration continued blocking innovative private testing. The FDA forced the nation’s most innovative firms to
Who should I invite to my party? What are the effects of expansionary monetary policy on employment, prices, incomes, production, consumption, and borrowing? How nutrition (and that saturated and animal fats are to be avoided). Many government policies and public school food offerings were based on this recommendation, natural resources and farmable land. Certainly scientific and technological innovations played a major role. But my questions for Neil deGrasse Tyson are these:
of the United Nations’ rules of the global war on drugs. However, mainstream drug policy experts remained “skeptical” of the Portuguese experiment even after nearly analyst who works at EMCDDA, Frank Zobel, calls Portugal’s policy “the greatest innovation in this field” and “that the policy is working. Drug consumption has not
Thanks to recent technological innovations, companies like 23andMe are now able to offer comprehensive genetic numerous restrictions on their freedom to advertise.) Who benefits from such a policy? First, due to the increased risk of purchasing a lemon, the value of used after millionaires on their deathbeds became the only people able to afford policies. While such drastic restrictions on the ability of insurers to discriminate
and Leonard’s own survey of the topic here ). Yet although the rhetoric of public policy has changed since the heyday of eugenics a century ago, economic policies with eugenic implications persist almost unnoticed in the 21 st century. succeed, but it can lead society to ruin by removing free choice and the free, innovative minds that go with it: “It is impossible to rear geniuses by eugenics, to
have an incentive to provide more supply, improved supply, and above all, innovative forms of supply. The opportunity to compete for profit in a genuine market He not only keeps a government mandate on what must be covered in an insurance policy ( the kitchen sink), which will make policies unaffordable for most. He even maintains federal subsidies for insurance
exercise preferences of a population. Another argument commonly used in healthcare-policy debates is that there are almost 46 million people who have no health economics profession is that intellectual property rights are necessary to foster innovation in the production of ideas. Recent work by Boldrin and Levine and Stephan to suit their needs, while providers of healthcare will compete, through constant innovation, to drive prices down and discover the most efficacious treatments.
and into the state sector. The history of socialist theory is bound up with policies toward the medical marketplace. To control people’s access to medical care medical care policies are still seen as the very soul of compassionate public policy, to be expanded and mandated, world without end. In each case, the national with huge burdens that have nothing to do with satisfying consumer demands. And innovation is limited by an array of penalties, subsidies, and regulations. The
we have here is the usual combination of graft and political payoffs called public policy. Of course prices will rise, which is what happens when something is further on the Medicare/Medicaid gravy train. Those price controls will dampen innovation because existing drugs will face a marketplace with more guaranteed
On May 3, 2010, I gave a talk to a class of students studying public health policy at the University of Washington. I began the talk by asking the students how economics profession is that intellectual-property rights are necessary to foster innovation in the production of ideas. Recent work by Boldrin and Levine and Stephan
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.