“Secession, State, and Economy.” Click here for Part 4, “Peaceful Disunion in Europe.” The moral grandeur of Lincoln is rooted in the myth that he made a war on by the vast majority of Americans, North and South, that America was a white European polity, and that the Indian and African populations were not—and were never exotic and alien population. What he could not tolerate was a dissolution of the Union, loss of revenue from the South, and a low-tariff zone on his southern border.
from resuming their fratricidal tendencies by the bonds of the corporatist European Coal and Steel Community, eventually superseded by the EuropeanUnion (EU), the countries no longer contemplate warfare as a means of settling
defense of democracy. Among the monarchs ruling on the eve of the current war in Europe, not one based his claim to power on a ruling position that his ancestors up with them, just as with all other democratic movements. The Problem of an East EuropeanUnion, And Relations with the Peoples of Eastern Europe The main problem of the
territory with their overflow. The accumulation of riches was as great as in Europe, whilst they were diffused so much more generally that poverty as well as dissent from the opinion which denies to Americans an honorable place beside European nations. It may be said that they have had no first-rate poet or painter, tilled the soil were taken by the war part because the armies laid it waste. The Union which was founded and sustained by the attachment of the people has been
of government intervention.” Oh, really? Klein also noted approvingly that the EuropeanUnion had helped kill the Worldcom/Sprint merger and he called for the creation of a
the larger nation. East Timor, Eritrea, and the devolutions of the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia (including the ongoing situation in Kosovo) illustrate the in that case, both succeeding governments transitioned to membership in the EuropeanUnion, guaranteeing the free flow of goods, labor and capital between them
delegated” to the United Sates. True enough, the Articles spoke of “Perpetual Union“; but as Gutzman astutely notes, the “fact that their union had no set end foreseen, was denoted by calling it ‘perpetual.’ (In those days treaties between European states often purported to be ‘perpetual.’ This did not mean that neither
Years’ War renewed the interrupted march by involving America in the concerns of Europe, and causing the colonies to react on the parent state. That was a consequence hostile to the Americans; but the real enemy was the House of Commons. The old European securities for good government were found insufficient protection against of the federal government were actually enumerated, and thus the states and the union were a check on each other. That principle of division was the most efficacious
looking. By the 1830s, the forces of nationalism and industrialism were sweeping Europe, and had begun to have an impact on an industrial North all too eager to meaning of “secession” in the secession of the southern states from the American Union. The Australian Constitution was formed with the American experience of Union that began the adventure of empire building in competition with the European empires. During this period of “manifest destiny,” “the big stick,” and
off. Mr. Smith’s experience reveals the consequences of the intervention of the European antitrust authorities in the free market, which can be illustrated by two United States in the Section 1 Sherman Act (Restrictive Trade Practice) and in the EuropeanUnion in Article 85 of the Treaty of Rome (Article 81 of the subsequent Treaty of
What is the Mises Institute?
The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.