Mises Daily

A
A
Home | Library | School Welfare

School Welfare

July 23, 1998

Investor's Business Daily, July 23, 1998, runs an outstanding article
on school vouchers, explaining with stunning clarity that vouchers constitute not choice but welfare:

School Choice or Bigger Government?

Milwaukee's Reform Came Wrapped In Red Tape
by Michael Chapman

School vouchers have been sold as a winning way to give parents a choice of
how to educate their kids. But vouchers may come with government strings
attached.

At least, that's the lesson from Milwaukee's school choice program.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court in June OK'd the plan, which the state
Legislature had approved years earlier. The public school lobby, backed by
the American Civil Liberties Union, may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

For now, though, the program goes on. And pro-voucher players are happy.

"It's a great victory," said Charles Glenn, an education professor at
Boston University.

While no doubt a victory for voucher supporters, the ruling opens the door
to something else: more government control over Milwaukee's private schools.

"Public controls do follow public money - not necessarily immediately, but
eventually," said economist Estelle James, who has studied school choice.

Already, more than 300 pages of state and federal rules have been dropped on
the program. Those rules govern admissions, eligibility, "religious
activities," student rights, curriculum standards, teacher certification
and accountability, among other things.

Sound familiar?

"They are going to look just like public schools," Milwaukee Public
Schools Superintendent Alan Brown said of the private schools that takevouchers.

That wasn't the intent. For those who support vouchers, the rules are
ominous.

"There's always a risk, (and) I prefer to see those restrictions removed.... I prefer unrestricted, universal vouchers," Nobel-winning economist
Milton Friedman, an active supporter of the Milwaukee plan, told IBD.

The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program will let up to 15,000 kids from
low-income families go to the schools of their choice. Each student gets a
voucher worth about $4,900.

The vouchers will help kids who come from Milwaukee's poorest neighborhoods.

"You're empowering the worst-performing kids to do better," said Richard
Komer, a senior litigator at the Washington-based Institute for Justice, a
pro-voucher legal group that represents Milwaukee families.

Said Glenn, "If we want to extend opportunities to poor kids and begin to
reverse the absolutely devastating education that they're getting, we have
to have such arrangements, even if there are risks involved."

Even though government involvement is inevitable with public-funded
vouchers, they may be "a way out for motivated low-income people who don't
have a way out," James said.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling emphasized three touchy points:

Private schools must select students on a "random basis."

Under an "opt-out" rule, private religious schools can't force students
with vouchers to take part in religious activity at the schools.

Kids already in private school cannot get vouchers unless they are in
kindergarten through the third grade "and meet certain income
requirements."

"The inability to pick and choose among students...is one of the
reasons public schools are in trouble," said Lew Rockwell, director of the
free-market Ludwig von Mises Institute. "Apply the same rule to private
schools, and you go a long way toward making them carbon copies of the
schools so many are anxious to flee."

Also, the voucher money doesn't go to kids of "middle-class people who
actually pay the taxes that support the public schools," Rockwell said.
Instead, it goes only to "those the government defines as 'poor.'"

That group already gets big subsidies for health care, housing, day care and
food. "Vouchers represent not a shrinkage of this welfare state but an
expansion, the equivalent of food stamps for private school," Rockwell
said.

A former high-level U.S. Education Department official agrees.

"The schools that participate behave exactly as government schools do. They
have no say over who they accept or reject - they lose control over their
enrollment," the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told IBD.

Also, the "opt-out" rule lets kids choose not to take part in religious
activities, which may be broadly defined. Is having a crucifix in a
classroom or a prayer before math class a religious activity?

"It's a kind of gag order in religious schools about God," said the former
Education Department official.

Religious schools in Milwaukee that want to take part in the program are
worried, says Howard Fuller, former superintendent of Milwaukee Public
Schools and now a Marquette University education professor.

Fuller says the worry is over the 300-plus pages of rules that the Milwaukee
Public Schools managed to slap on the program.

"None of these regulations were required by the legislature," Fuller said.
"And if there's enforcement of these laws, then we'll have a reluctance on
the part of some of the (religious) schools to get involved. Then we'll never know whether this experiment will work because we'll have a program
but few sectarian schools will join in."

Dan McKinley, head of Partners Advancing Values in Education - a pro-voucher
group - also worries that the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction may
try to push its luck.

The DPI is charged with overseeing the program and each school's random
admission policy.

"DPI believes that every student entering a private school retains the same
rights as a public school student," McKinley said.

While the DPI has been cooperative, he said, it has issued a "whole list of
student rights that come mainly from federal statutes that the (voucher)
schools are supposed to sign off on."

These rules forbid single-sex schools. There are five such private schools
in Milwaukee. The rules also include provisions for disabled kids, which
some private schools may not be able to afford.

"The purpose of the choice program was not to make the private schools
public schools," Fuller said.

Despite the problems, voucher supporters are optimistic.

"The bottom line is that it's the schools' decision" whether to
participate, said Clint Bolick, director of the Institute for Justice.

Said his colleague Komer: "The ultimate goal is to move to a system of pure
choice for everyone. It's largely a question of, How do we get from here to
there?"

Rich Seder, director of education studies at the free-market Reason
Foundation, agrees.

"The one saving factor is that the private schools can drop out if they
feel that the state government is becoming too regulatory," he said.

Glenn predicts the program will fuel competition between private and public
schools. This will give each school greater focus, he says.

But some--including Friedman --believe vouchers are just a half-step toward
real reform. They ask: Why have government involved in education at all?

.
"A voucher is a wealth-transfer scheme that takes money from the haves and
gives it to the have-nots...by the force of taxation," said Marshall
Fritz, head of the Fresno, Calif.-based Separation of School & State
Alliance. "The name for that is welfare. A free lunch is welfare. A free
math lesson is welfare. Public housing is welfare. Public schooling is
welfare."

Sheldon Richman, an author who has written extensively on school choice
issues, agrees. He notes support for voucher programs is often couched in
terms of "social justice."

"Poor people don't have the same choices in cars or country clubs or
restaurants," Richman said. "Should we have vouchers across the board? All
of a sudden they're egalitarian."

* * * *
C) Copyright 1998 Investors Business Daily, Inc.

For more news, click on "Latest News."


Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

Follow Mises Institute