Mises Daily

A
A
Home | Library | The Great Thanksgiving Hoax

The Great Thanksgiving Hoax

November 20, 1999

Tags Free MarketsWorld HistoryInterventionismPraxeologyOther Schools of ThoughtPolitical Theory

Each year at this time school children all over America are taught the official Thanksgiving
story, and newspapers, radio, TV, and magazines devote vast amounts of time and space to it. It
is all very colorful and fascinating.

It is also very deceiving. This official story is nothing like what really happened. It is a fairy
tale, a whitewashed and sanitized collection of half-truths which divert attention away from
Thanksgiving's real meaning.

The official story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower, coming to America and
establishing the Plymouth colony
in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard, and half the colonists die. But the survivors are
hard working and tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians. The
harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration, and give thanks to God. They are
grateful for the wonderful new abundant land He has given them.

The official story then has the Pilgrims living more or less happily ever after, each year
repeating the first Thanksgiving. Other early colonies also have hard times at first, but they soon
prosper and adopt the annual tradition of giving thanks for this prosperous new land called
America.

The problem with this official story is that the harvest of 1621 was not bountiful, nor were
the colonists hardworking or tenacious. 1621 was a famine year and many of the colonists were
lazy thieves.

In his 'History of
Plymouth Plantation,'
the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the
colonists went hungry for years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred
instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with "corruption," and with "confusion and
discontent." The crops were small because "much was stolen both by night and day, before it
became scarce eatable."

In the harvest feasts of 1621 and 1622, "all had their hungry bellies filled," but only briefly.
The prevailing condition during those years was not the abundance the official story claims, it
was famine and death. The first "Thanksgiving" was not so much a celebration as it was the last
meal of condemned men.

But in subsequent years something changes. The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly,
"instead of famine now God gave them plenty," Bradford wrote, "and the face of things was
changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God." Thereafter, he
wrote, "any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day." In fact, in
1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, "they began to think how they might raise as
much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop." They began to question their form of
economic organization.

This had required that "all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any
other means" were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, "all such persons as
are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common
stock." A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he
needed.

This "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" was an early form of
socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that "young men that are
most able and fit for labor and service" complained about being forced to "spend their time and
strength to work for other men's wives and children." Also, "the strong, or man of parts, had no
more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak." So the young and strong refused
to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a
parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit.
In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible results. At
Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload of settlers that arrived, less than half
would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only
one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10,
called "The Starving Time," the population fell from five-hundred to sixty.

Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every bit as
dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the
switch there was "plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth
procure." He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, "we reaped not so much corn
from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now."

Before these free markets were established, the colonists had nothing for which to be
thankful. They were in the same situation as Ethiopians are today, and for the same reasons. But
after free markets were established, the resulting abundance was so dramatic that the annual
Thanksgiving celebrations became common throughout the colonies, and in 1863, Thanksgiving
became a national holiday.

Thus the real reason for Thanksgiving, deleted from the official story, is: Socialism does not
work; the one and only source of abundance is free markets, and we thank God we live in a
country where we can have them.

* * * * *
Mr. Maybury writes on investments.

This article originally appeared in The Free Market, November 1985.


Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

Follow Mises Institute