The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Ridiculous: the rich are completely satisfied

rated by 0 users
This post has 3 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Wheylous Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2011 4:53 PM

The superrich command and control so many resources that they are effectively satiated: increasing or decreasing how much wealth they have has no effect on their happiness.

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/12/the-70-solution-taxing-the-rich-department.html#comment-6a00e551f0800388340162fdba3207970d

How can anyone put forth such a ridiculously ignorant statement? It takes no great mind to realize that if a man is satiated by his wealth he would take no further steps to accrue more of it. Since human action is the only reliable insight into utility preferences, the author is demonstrably wrong.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 19,520
Eric080 replied on Mon, Dec 12 2011 5:20 PM

There are some things I want to do that I don't quite have the cash for.  I'll just steal a couple hundred from Brad DeLong.  I assume he's rich enough, it won't really be that big of a deal.  I'm a relatively poor college student, so the general utility of society will increase if I steal a few hundred dollars from him, so therefore he ought not mind me.

"And it may be said with strict accuracy, that the taste a man may show for absolute government bears an exact ratio to the contempt he may profess for his countrymen." - de Tocqueville
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 11
Points 205
Bebob replied on Tue, Dec 13 2011 3:33 AM

The general idea being there that you only have the right of ownership of something if it increases your happiness.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 645
Points 9,865
James replied on Wed, Dec 14 2011 6:40 AM

It's a self-defeating argument...  If money is power, then they clearly don't have nearly enough if the government can come and take it away any time it likes.  They don't have control over those resources if someone else does.

But there's always someone riding above a populist redistribution scheme.  There's always someone who profits from the inside knowledge privy only to those who have a hand in planning such an occurence.  Somehow the Queen is still really the wealthiest and therefore the most powerful person in the Western world.

You have to keep trying to acquire more wealth when there are always people trying to take what you've got away from you.  You have to be able to afford lawyers to defend you, and lobbyists to buy favours for you, and you have to bankroll your own candidates for public office, and you have to buy your own media houses and run them at a loss to stop your opponents from using them to smear you, and you have to give out so many bribes...  It's impossible, you have to be a very rich man to live like a rich man, an extremely rich man to live like a very rich man and so on.  If you thought it was hard to win a game of king of the hill, try playing king of the pyramid.

Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap