Mises Wire

Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
A
A
< | < | <

Science and Skepticism

0 Views

[cross-posted at Liberty & Power] Philosopher John Searle has recently argued that the progress of empirical science has now made possible a "new kind of philosophy" no longer beset by the skeptical doubts that worried Descartes and Hume. I agree that philosophers needn't be troubled by such skeptical doubts, but I don't think the case against skepticism depends in any way on the progress of empirical science; on the contrary, we can take empirical science seriously in the first place only because we already have grounds for rejecting skepticism. See my discussion, which also touches on such topics as praxeology and socialist calculation, here.

Roderick T. Long is a senior fellow of the Mises Institute and a professor of philosophy at Auburn University. He runs the Molinari Institute and Molinari Society. His website is Praxeology.net.

Image source:

Add Comment

Shield icon wire