What Has Government Done to Our Money? Compulsory Monopoly of the Mint
What Has Government Done to Our Money?
Murray N. Rothbard
III.
Government Meddling With Money
3. Compulsory Monopoly of the Mint
For government to use counterfeiting to add to its revenue, many
lengthy steps must be travelled down the road away from the free
market. Government could not simply invade a functioning free
market and print its own paper tickets. Done so abruptly, few
people would accept the government's money. Even in modern times,
many people in "backward countries" have simply refused
to accept paper money, and insist on trading only in gold.
Governmental incursion, therefore, must be far more subtle and
gradual.
Until a few centuries ago, there were no banks, and therefore the
government could not use the banking engine for massive inflation
as it can today. What could it do when only gold and silver
circulated?
The first step, taken firmly by every sizeable government, was to
seize an absolute monopoly of the minting business. That
was the indispensable means of getting control of the coinage
supply. The king's or the lord's picture was stamped upon coins,
and the myth was propagated that coinage is an essential
prerogative of royal or baronial "sovereignty." The
mintage monopoly allowed government to supply whatever
denominations of coin it, and not the public, wanted. As a
result, the variety of coins on the market was forcibly reduced.
Furthermore, the mint could now charge a high price, greater than
costs ("seigniorage"), a price just covering costs
("brassage"), or supply coins free of charge. Seigniorage
was a monopoly price, and it imposed a special burden on the
conversion of bullion to coin; gratuitous coinage, on the other
hand, overstimulated the manufacture of coins from bullion, and
forced the general taxpayer to pay for minting services utilized
by others.
Having acquired the mintage monopoly, governments fostered the
use of the name of the monetary unit, doing their best to
separate the name from its true base in the underlying weight of
the coin. This, too, was a highly important step, for it
liberated each government from the necessity of abiding by the
common money of the world market. Instead of using grains or
grams of gold or silver, each State fostered its own national
name in the supposed interests of monetary patriotism: dollars,
marks, francs, and the like. The shift made possible the pre-eminent means of governmental counterfeiting of coin: debasement.