The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Defending the Undefendable

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 6 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 329
Points 4,390
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
Staff
SystemAdministrator

Defending the Undefendable is a very special book. It is perfectly suited for anyone who has been exposed to libertarian ideas but is still "hung up" on certain issues. It is also a very exciting and educational read for even die hard libertarians. Chapter 6, "The Blackmailer" is one of my favorites. I was still fairly new to libertarian philosophy when I first read this book and The Blackmailer really surprised me. I was certain, before I began the chapter, that there was simply no way that Dr. Block could convince me that blackmailers were worthy of defense. I am pleased to say that I now see the truth, thanks to Dr. Block. As he explained, blackmailers are much preferable to the local gossiper.

The Blackmailer chapter was not an isolated incident for me and I suspect that most everyone who reads this book will have a similar chapter in which he or she thinks "wow I can't believe he convinced me." That is part of what makes the book such an enjoyable read; the surprise one feels when Dr. Block slowly leads you to the edge of a cliff then suddenly shoves you over. The whole process of discovery is really quite enjoyable.

 

Please share you thoughts about Defending the Undefendable. Did you like the book? Do you have a favorite chapter?

Not Ranked
Male
Posts 2
Points 40
Michael M replied on Mon, Nov 16 2009 6:29 PM

I just finished the book a week ago.  Already a die hard libertarian, but there were a few on here that I thought would test it.  Specifically I found "The Litterer" the most intriguing, because I thought no one would defend it.  Block makes a good point that the private enterprise does best in deciding the environments where litter is permissible or not, such as the difference between a baseball stadium or movie theater and a hospital.  I also found the ticket scalper, nongovernment counterfeiter, importer, and rate buster (to name a few) to be informative in economics.  Block's first chapters, dealing with sex and drugs, are for some beginning shock effect and are amusing as well.  Overall, a fun read.

  • Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 5
Points 55
Sir Irb replied on Thu, Mar 11 2010 4:40 PM

Just to quick ditto you; the Litterer was the one that before reading I thought "come on now, you cant pull this off", but he does. Block is great in this text. Cant wait for a new one-- DtU II. He keeps saying its comming; he said it would be out in 09, yet I wait. Hope he gets this book on the market. It will be great.

  • Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 167
Points 2,395
Lyle replied on Sat, Dec 25 2010 9:59 PM

Definitely a book to challenge one's worldview either economically or ethically.

Out of 33 chapters, I found only 5 arguments I did not agree with:

1. Denial of carte blanche abortion is denial of self ownership and a throwback to slavery for women,
2. The Judicial & Executive branches of any government are in the business of social justice, not legal justice,
3. Private charity perpetuates heritable characteristics that are undesirable,
4. Unborn children may be aborted because they are undeserving of the caretaking afforded born children,
5. Counterfeiting counterfeit money steals not from the merchant when spent, but from the initial counterfeiter.

Regardless, Block has produced an effective primer that demonstrates why non-aggressive and non-violent "crimes" should be legalized. While they may be destructive to the individual, they are not destructive to society so long as they remain legal. In some cases, these "crimes" prove to improve materially the lot of some even if it does not improve their ethical lot. Nevertheless, it is the liberty of each to make the cost-benefit analysis for oneself.

  • Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 55
Points 2,315
I feel the same way you do. But if and when defending the undefendable number 2 comes out, what will the next list of characters he will defend? I was originally your typical neocon if you will, but this book plus a couple by Rothbard convinced me overtime to be a libertarian and then read some more, become more radical, ultimately becoming minarchist/anarcho capitalist. My list of "undefendables" not mentioned are the gambler and the illegal business vendor (meaning someone who sets up to sell street food without a permit). There could be more. But has anyone rebutted the critics of this classic as we have seen in the mises store the "detractors"?
  • Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 212
Points 4,330
Aquila replied on Tue, Dec 28 2010 8:50 AM
Don't forget the illegal immigrant.
  • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
| RSS