The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Austrian policies at a state level (Texas)

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 2 Followers

Not Ranked
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,520
Williamloveseconomics Posted: Sun, May 20 2012 2:01 AM

Okay so i had this coversation with a friend online and they said that Texas has been one of the most pro Austrian econ  like states compared to other. Here is their quote 

"what I said was that Texas has applied austrain type economics more than any other state, That does not mean that every state has tried it or even part of it. Just means Texas has subscribed to austrian economics as a base for policies more than other states that have had legislators that are austrian fans. Most of the states that have the largest increases in new private biz the last three years are the opposite of austrian in most of their policies"

Now i know i shouldn't ask other to do my research for me, but does anyone have sources to help counter this. Specially regarding Texas.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

So you've got a friend who makes a claim...and you're asking us to provide you resources to help prove his claim wrong?

Why don't you just ask him to actually support his claim?

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,520

I don't understand what you mean by want him to support his claim. If you don't have anything to offer that's fine. I personally have a few things to mention and links to back up how Texas isn't even the state that be closest to an Austrian approach.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

I don't know what you mean by "want him to support his claim".  I didn't say that.  I said why don't you just ask him to actually support his claim?

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,520

Sorry, but i still don't understand what you mean, and the point in asking that? Maybe its just over my head and im overthinking the question.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 806
Points 12,855

Your friend hasn't made an argument. He's only made an assertion. You can counter his claim by merely saying, "No it isn't" and not contribute anything less to the conversation than he has. This is because he's offered no support for his claim. An actual argument would be something like "Texas has applied Austrian economics given policies X, Y, and Z." Now you can offer an counter-argument because he's actually made an argument. So a valid response to the comment you posted would be something along the lines of "Proof?"

If I had a cake and ate it, it can be concluded that I do not have it anymore. HHH

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,520

LOL i wasn't even thinking along those line. Thanks guys. I guess i just felt the need to automatically counter with my proof that he is wrong. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

Williamloveseconomics:
I guess i just felt the need to automatically counter with my proof that he is wrong.

How do you even know he's wrong?

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,520

Because Texas compared to Utah or NH, has done nothing at allowing currency competition.  Texas isn't even ranked that well in economic freedom http://mercatus.org/freedom-in-the-50-states/TX compared to other states. Hell dallas has a Federal reserve building there. The only areas i can see he might have a point is the Tx and NV are the only states (some areas in NH) that respect allodial title, has no state income tax, and Rick Perry mentioning secession (unlikely).

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135
John James replied on Sun, May 20 2012 11:25 AM

Williamloveseconomics:
Because Texas compared to Utah or NH, has done nothing at allowing currency competition.

Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I'm pretty sure there are other things that could be considered "austrain type economics" policy concerns.

 

Texas isn't even ranked that well in economic freedom http://mercatus.org/freedom-in-the-50-states/TX compared to other states

I'm not a big fan of rankings like that.  Certainly not just accepting them blindly.  Don't forget Santorum pointed to a ranking of Congressman than gave Ron Paul a 50% score on gun rights...and another one that gave Ron Paul something similar on pro-life. 

I'd have to see details on their methodology. 

Either way, I'd consider 15th out 50 pretty darn good.

 

Hell dallas has a Federal reserve building there.

What's that got to do with anything?

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap