The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Business Cycle and Consumer Credit

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 1 verified answer | 4 Replies | 2 Followers

Not Ranked
Male
15 Posts
Points 250
Gabriel Godinho posted on Tue, Mar 6 2012 11:56 AM

I've been wondering if the Austrian Business Cycle Theory still holds if consumer credit is allowed into the analysis. Since it certanly affects the intrest rates being a componet of both demand and supply of loanable funds, and at the same time, it is not credit flowing into investment as a result of savings (as the Austrian Business Cycle seems to assume), I have a problem understanding how to explain the theory with that.

If one of the central points of the theory is that real savings are not enough to accomplish investment projects initiated, after lower intrest rates are set by the central bank, how the theory holds if the credit is not flowing to investment projects but to consumers?

  • | Post Points: 35

Answered (Verified) Verified Answer

Top 25 Contributor
Male
4,248 Posts
Points 70,755

I've been wondering if the Austrian Business Cycle Theory still holds if consumer credit is allowed into the analysis.

Yes, in its essentials. The heart of the theory is that cycles are caused by money printing. The money will inevitably go into wasting resources. In Mises' time, money was usually lent only to people who knew what to do with it, and Mises had to show that the conditions of money printing and low interest rates that result will force the money to be wasted anyway.

With consumer credit, the whole thing is much easier to understand. The credit card companies lend the money to consumers, meaning to consume, meaning to eat stuff up. None of that money is put into increasing production. So of course as long as there is money being spent, times will be good. When it's all gone, and cannot be paid bak, and the resources are consumed without being replenished, the crash will come. All this happens no matter what the interest rate.

 

My humble blog

It's easy to refute an argument if you first misrepresent it. William Keizer

  • | Post Points: 25

All Replies

Top 25 Contributor
Male
4,248 Posts
Points 70,755

I've been wondering if the Austrian Business Cycle Theory still holds if consumer credit is allowed into the analysis.

Yes, in its essentials. The heart of the theory is that cycles are caused by money printing. The money will inevitably go into wasting resources. In Mises' time, money was usually lent only to people who knew what to do with it, and Mises had to show that the conditions of money printing and low interest rates that result will force the money to be wasted anyway.

With consumer credit, the whole thing is much easier to understand. The credit card companies lend the money to consumers, meaning to consume, meaning to eat stuff up. None of that money is put into increasing production. So of course as long as there is money being spent, times will be good. When it's all gone, and cannot be paid bak, and the resources are consumed without being replenished, the crash will come. All this happens no matter what the interest rate.

 

My humble blog

It's easy to refute an argument if you first misrepresent it. William Keizer

  • | Post Points: 25
Top 25 Contributor
Male
4,248 Posts
Points 70,755

P. S. de Soto in his book, Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, has a short chapter on your very question. Chapter 6, section 3. Language is a bit technical.

My humble blog

It's easy to refute an argument if you first misrepresent it. William Keizer

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
143 Posts
Points 2,440

Huerta de Soto, himself :

 
Chapter 5:
2) The Effect on the Productive Structure of an Increase in Credit Financed Under a Prior Increase in Voluntary Saving
Second, in most cases consumer loans are granted to finance the purchase of durable consumer goods, which as we saw in previous sections, are ultimately comparable to capital goods maintained over a number of consecutive stages of production, while the durable consumer good’s capacity to provide services to its owner lasts. Under these circumstances, by far the most common, the economic effects of consumer loans, with respect to encouraging investment and lengthening productive stages, are identical to and indistinguishable from the effects of any increase in savings directly invested in the capital goods of any stage in the productive structure.  (p. 316)
Chapter 6:
3) Consumer Credit and the Theory of the Cycle 
Hence we have only to consider how to revise our theory of the business cycle if a significant portion of credit expansion is devoted (contrary to the usual practice) to financing not durable consumer goods, but the current consumption of each financial year (in the form of goods and services which directly satisfy human needs and are exhausted in the course of the period in question). Substantial modifications to our analysis are unnecessary in this case as well, since one of the following is true: either credit expansion satisfies a more or less constant demand for credit to finance existing direct consumption in the economic system, and given that credit markets are like “communicating vessels,” such expansion frees the capacity to grant loans in favor of the stages furthest from consumption, thus instigating the typical processes of expansion and recession we are familiar with; or the loans exert their impact on current consumption while no additional capacity is freed for granting loans to industries from the stages furthest from consumption.
 
Only in this second case, insignificant in practice, is there a direct effect on the monetary demand for consumer goods and services. Indeed the new money immediately pushes up the prices of consumer goods and diminishes, in relative terms, the prices of the factors of production. The “Ricardo Effect” is set in motion, and entrepreneurs begin to hire more workers, in relative terms, and substitute them for machinery. Thus a trend toward the flattening of the productive structure is established without a prior expansionary boom in the stages furthest from consumption. (p. 406-407)
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
15 Posts
Points 250

Thank you guys =), Ill take a look at de Soto's writings

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap