Could this be possible?

Reply

Em_ptySkin Posted: Tue, Jul 12 2011 10:58 AM

rated by 0 users

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d33-Lk5Zbw

 "It's easy to pick apart loose change with its missiles, pods, and complete absence of who or how anyone got bombs in the buildings, it's easy to pick on Alex "illuminuts" Jones, and easy to pick on David "lizard-aliens" Icke, etc but it's not easy to pick apart work and film grounded in verifiable reality which is what I have done."

i cannot embed for some reason.

I'm posting this outside of the 9/11 truth thread cause i would like to limit people's discussion to what is in this film.  So please don't flame me for it.

Presentation is pretty amateur, but i feel like it has a LOT more crediblity than the standard bs. He claims that most of the 9/11 blame is to be pinned on...countries that people probably couldn't handle. Hopefully people here will watch it.

There is a good bit on "military kenyesianism"

Reply

John James replied on Wed, Jul 13 2011 2:15 AM

rated by 0 users

Whoa. 3+ hours. That's gotta be the longest single presentation I've ever seen on youtube. (I haven't watched it yet, I'm just saying). It might be a while before I get around to it, but when I do I'll post an assessment here. In the mean time, I think Loose Change doesn't get the credit it deserves.

I think most people aren't aware there were literally 5 different films in that series. I've viewed each of the first 4 all the way through. Most of the most outlandish things that people use to demonize and dismiss the film and its makers (and the "9/11 truth movement") (e.g. "missiles and pods") were introduced in the first edition only. Through it's progression, the films got better and more seriously done. The third version, "2nd edition: recut" is actually not so crazy. It asks some very important questions, and while it does keep a lot of the storyline of previous versions, and still tries to be too cute at times, I think deserves to be taken seriously. And Loose Change: Final Cut is a completely different film. The script is completely different, and it is as professional and serious as any other documentary on such a subject. I would be very interested in hearing any sort of critique of that film.

And to be honest, and haven't even seen the 5th film yet. I wasn't even aware of it until very recently...but judging by the progression of the previous ones, I would guess it demands serious consideration.

For anyone truly interested in the subject, I definitely recommend a viewing of the films. Forget the first two, but at the very least, watch "2nd edition: recut" and "final cut". They are completely different films. I'll have to watch the latest one, and I'll do a review of that as well, but I wouldn't be surprised if it is a completely different film as well, and deserves to be seen.

Reply

John James replied on Wed, Jul 13 2011 2:55 AM

rated by 0 users

In a similar vein of where it looks like this film goes, here's a nice look into the way things are interrelated:

And also to his point,

7 Insane Conspiracies That Actually Happened

Reply

Em_ptySkin replied on Wed, Jul 13 2011 11:20 AM

rated by 0 users

ive seen a few of the loose change ones.  and things like fabled enemies and such.

The above one that i posted i just watched over the last few days and it has the most convincing evidence of the perps.  The bombs and their placement in the buildings, the failed attempt on the G. Washington bridge.

im gonna watch an american coup and see how that goes.