The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Cable Companies. What do you see happening to them in the near future?

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 1 Reply | 0 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
111 Posts
Points 3,295
razerfish posted on Fri, Sep 17 2010 4:14 AM

One of my favorite monopolies to hate -- cable companies. I'm at least glad for a glimmer of competition with satellite, though it can't really compete with "terrestrial" companies as far as speed and bandwidth. I remember the original promise of cable was commercial free programming but what a laugh that turned out to be, other than prescription based channels like HBO or Showtime. These guys used their monopoly to charge us consumers and the content suppliers for their pipe into our homes. They made money from us ($25 - $100 per month depending on what channels and or internet you want) and they made money from selling advertisements.

As internet speeds starting getting faster (Internet 2.0), I think cable companies are totally fucked. I said this a few years ago when I saw where this was going. The last thing they want is really fast internet because then all they will be are internet service providers and the content providers will simply sell their own advertising and stream their shows directly over the internet to viewers. I predicted that cable companies will have to become content providers to survive and will start buying studios and production houses.  This has already started happening.  Or they'll have to stall the super fast internet speeds and/or hope for government help, though I don't see that as likely to happen.

That was my prediction a few years back and I'm sticking to it.  Cable companies that don't provide content are not long on this earth, and I surely won't miss them.

My other thought was how do you have free competition with something like cable where it's so expensive to lay lines?  It's one of those public use type situations I would support using a public framework. I know it violates all Libertarian principles, but how could you have competition with this product other than satellite? It's just so expensive to dig up and lay new cable that once someone does it once, it basically owns that area for good. So how could you make it more competitive using a free market solution?

  • | Post Points: 20

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
Male
1,945 Posts
Points 36,550

The state granted monolpoly territories will be abolished, so I can finally get some reliable MF'n internet.  Curse you, Comcast!!!

"What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." - Max Stirner, Stirner's Critics
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap