<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Equilbrium vs the ERE</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462491.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:11:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:462491</guid><dc:creator>Think Blue</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462491.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=462491</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/17956.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/17956.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20054.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/20054.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Equilbrium vs the ERE</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462481.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:40:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:462481</guid><dc:creator>xahrx</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462481.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=462481</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Equillibrium is a static condition, any model solved to its market clearing price basically, without&amp;nbsp;thought for what follows.&amp;nbsp; The Evenly Rotating Economy is a thought model where uncertainty doesn&amp;#39;t exist that allows you to intellectually differentiate between a capital return and profit for one example.&amp;nbsp; I believe there are other consequences to the lack of uncertainty as well, like no money, and demonstrating&amp;nbsp;interest as pure time preference.&amp;nbsp; Everything is invested to come due when needed for immediate barter.&amp;nbsp; But the real difference is it&amp;#39;s a dynamic thought model where there is no &amp;#39;end&amp;#39; to the movement in the economy it postulates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Equilbrium vs the ERE</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462477.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:17:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:462477</guid><dc:creator>DMXRoid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/462477.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=462477</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a functional difference between what Mises and Rothbard call the ERE and what other economists refer to as the equilbrium state for an economy, or are they synonyms?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>