<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/27.aspx</link><description>Everything else.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512280.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:16:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:512280</guid><dc:creator>shackleford</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512280.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=512280</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/community/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;John James:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Depends on how you define &amp;quot;statist&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; I think &lt;em&gt;Noam&lt;/em&gt; Chomsky would be fine with the label &amp;quot;anarcho-syndicalist&amp;quot;...which...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/daily/5590/"&gt;Anarcho-Syndicalism: A Recipe for Ruin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/daily/5764"&gt;Syndical Syndrome&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.ca/posts/articles/chomskys-economics/"&gt;Chomsky&amp;rsquo;s Economics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/community/forums/t/21126.aspx"&gt;Critique of Anarcho-Syndicalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/community/forums/t/32643.aspx"&gt;Substantial critique of An-Syndicalism?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	At the very least relative to Buckley. Chomsky is more of a statist than him.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Simply skimming the first tlink, it seems almost like &lt;em&gt;anarcho&lt;/em&gt;-communism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512279.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:12:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:512279</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512279.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=512279</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Depends on how you define &amp;quot;statist&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; I think &lt;em&gt;Noam&lt;/em&gt; Chomsky would be fine with the label &amp;quot;anarcho-syndicalist&amp;quot;...which...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/daily/5590/"&gt;Anarcho-Syndicalism: A Recipe for Ruin&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/daily/5764"&gt;Syndical Syndrome&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.ca/posts/articles/chomskys-economics/"&gt;Chomsky&amp;rsquo;s Economics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/community/forums/t/21126.aspx"&gt;Critique of Anarcho-Syndicalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/community/forums/t/32643.aspx"&gt;Substantial critique of An-Syndicalism?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512278.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:57:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:512278</guid><dc:creator>shackleford</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512278.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=512278</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Isn&amp;#39;t Gnome Chomsky a &lt;em&gt;severe&lt;/em&gt; statist?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512277.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:50:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:512277</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512277.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=512277</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;strong&gt;Why Do Economists Disagree?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	featuring Joseph Salerno, Jeffrey Miron, Graciela Chichilnisky, and Robert H. Frank (moderator)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The introductions of the panel start at 4:25, the actual discussion starts at 9:30.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(I will warn you...there are a lot of abhorrent notions put forth in this discussion (particularly by the moderator...which, what exactly makes him a moderator in this discussion I&amp;#39;m not sure), and Salerno doesn&amp;#39;t talk near enough to even begin to balance out the discussion.&amp;nbsp; I was actually quite disappointed at how silent he was.&amp;nbsp; And in the few times he did speak, I don&amp;#39;t think he did enough to actually present the opposing understanding.&amp;nbsp; However it was refreshing and promising to see at least two Austrians from the audience come to the microphone.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512276.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 02:41:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:512276</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/512276.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=512276</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;h3&gt;
	&lt;a href="https://mises.org/community/forums/t/28761.aspx"&gt;An entire thread on the video above.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/496128.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:07:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:496128</guid><dc:creator>hashem</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/496128.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=496128</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Seen a LOT of debates. None as gripping as this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/496055.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:27:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:496055</guid><dc:creator>surfinbird</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/496055.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=496055</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/464276.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:28:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:464276</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/464276.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=464276</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p id="watch-headline-title"&gt;
	&lt;span class="playlist-video-item-base-content"&gt;&lt;span class="video-info"&gt;&lt;span class="video-overview"&gt;&lt;span class="title video-title yt-uix-tooltip" dir="ltr" title="Debate: Government Spending Can Play an Important Role in Boosting Economic Growth"&gt;Debate: Government Spending Can Play an Important Role&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="long-title" dir="ltr" id="eow-title" title="Debate: Government Spending Can Play an Important Role in Boosting Economic Growth"&gt;in Boosting Economic Growth&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Karl Smith vs. Robert P. Murphy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/464179.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:37:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:464179</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/464179.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=464179</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	From Tom Woods:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/technological-pessimism-and-optimism/" rel="bookmark" title="Permalink to Technological Pessimism and Optimism"&gt;Technological Pessimism and Optimism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;
			That&amp;rsquo;s how this debate is being described, anyway. It&amp;rsquo;s between Peter Thiel and George Gilder, both interesting guys, but with drastically different perspectives on the future prospects for technology..&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;
			&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463973.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:43:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463973</guid><dc:creator>hashem</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463973.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463973</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/community/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Graham Wright:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;How Much Government Is Necessary? - Stefan Molyneux v Michael Badnarik An epic debate between Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio and Michael Badnarik, 2004 Libertarian Presidential Candidate on the question &amp;#39;How Much Government is Necessary?&amp;#39; &amp;nbsp;Molyneux argues the anarchist position that no government is necessary. &amp;nbsp;Badnarik defends the minarchist view that a small government, limited by a constitution, is necessary.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I was going to post this. I don&amp;#39;t think Badnarik really has any argument or that he logically addresses anything Molyneux puts forth, or that the debate is of much value except learning how to speak/perform persuasively in public. Molyneux delivers one of the most brilliant performances of public speaking and opposing another public speaker I have ever witnessed; its a great bonus that he is defending anarchism. I think there is a lot to challenge Molyneux on philosophically and regarding his manipulating people for money, but I can&amp;#39;t say I&amp;#39;ve ever seen a better public performance as far as being captivating and persuasive (truth or falsity of his ideas notwithstanding).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Also, this thread is much needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463958.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:31:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463958</guid><dc:creator>Williamloveseconomics</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463958.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463958</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463915.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:55:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463915</guid><dc:creator>Graham Wright</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463915.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463915</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Walter Block v A Room Full Of Statists&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Walter Block spends half an hour making the case for privatizing roads and highways, then answers questions about it. The subsequent debate and discussion goes off on tangents, with Block giving an excellent, pithy description of a private law society to an audience utterly unfamiliar with the idea.&amp;nbsp; (This wider discussion begins at 37:20).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Much Government Is Necessary? - Stefan Molyneux v Michael Badnarik&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	An epic debate between Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio and Michael Badnarik, 2004 Libertarian Presidential Candidate on the question &amp;#39;How Much Government is Necessary?&amp;#39;&amp;nbsp; Molyneux argues the anarchist position that no government is necessary.&amp;nbsp; Badnarik defends the minarchist view that a small government, limited by a constitution,&amp;nbsp;is necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolved: It is Smart to get a PhD in Economics - Walter Block v Gary North&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Walter Block argues in favor of the resolution.&amp;nbsp; Gary North argues against.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463624.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 04:49:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463624</guid><dc:creator>nbome</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463624.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463624</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	GMU Econ Society Debate: Separation of Health &amp;amp; State&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463617.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:30:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463617</guid><dc:creator>Anarcho-libertarian</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463617.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463617</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Here is a debate between&amp;nbsp;libertarians Ron Paul &amp;amp; Doug Casey vs. conservatives Larry Abraham &amp;amp; Dinesh D&amp;#39;Souza on foreign policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_eA1NWiwMQ"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ze98wCHJII"&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaXOTpk7BCw"&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC-ZxzYneOQ"&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IOZgXhgF5A"&gt;Part 5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BqTrhrF86o"&gt;Part 6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2rKQ6vyzYA"&gt;Part 7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Back when I was a neo-con, Part 6 was the one that really helped slap me awake. I saw that Paul just owned Dinesh, who I was a follower of at the time. Paul&amp;#39;s summary of Robert Pape&amp;#39;s book blew me away because it gave a different reason for why suicide terrorism exists besides a crazy belief in radical Islam, which is the only explanation I had heard up to that time. &amp;nbsp;His summary was such a good response that I memorized it and shared it with whoever would listen. I have often wished that Paul would debate like he does here in part 6 in the Republican debates:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: debate videos</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463608.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 02:11:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463608</guid><dc:creator>ThatOldGuy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/463608.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=27&amp;PostID=463608</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Two of the greatest debates I&amp;#39;ve ever seen- and in musical form as well!&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;br /&gt;
	(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>