<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Current Events</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/197.aspx</link><description>Politics, disasters, war and peace.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514667.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:51:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514667</guid><dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514667.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514667</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think he should have supported him the whole way. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m no expert on American politics but isn&amp;#39;t Hagel the most non interventionist of defense secretaries that Obama could conceivably nominate?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	What does that mean? Obama is able to nominate anyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514658.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:03:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514658</guid><dc:creator>Buzz Killington</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514658.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514658</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Because he&amp;#39;s a nice guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514650.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:47:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514650</guid><dc:creator>Malachi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514650.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514650</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	ok, why wouldnt he vote to confirm? whats wrong with hagel that couldnt be said about kerry, clinton, condi, kissinger, etc.? I&amp;#39;m genuinely curious why there seems to be an expectation that mainstream politicians oppose the confirmation of political appointments &amp;quot;just because.&amp;quot; the country could still go to war with a vacant cabinet, or a cabinet full of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; or unconfirmed bureaucrats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514634.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 01:13:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514634</guid><dc:creator>shackleford</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514634.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514634</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Well, it seems to me that Obama hires incompetent yes-men. Rand Paul probably did this so he can legitimately claim that he is not another Republican &amp;quot;obstructionist.&amp;quot; He&amp;#39;s trying to come across as fair and impartial and not a naysaying ideologue. It may give his later arguments and run more credence as someone who carefully considered the issues who is not simply a partisan hack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514628.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:49:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514628</guid><dc:creator>Meistro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514628.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514628</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I think he should have supported him the whole way. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m no expert on American politics but isn&amp;#39;t Hagel the most non interventionist of defense secretaries that Obama could conceivably nominate?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514544.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:10:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514544</guid><dc:creator>shackleford</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514544.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514544</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Well, I guess nobody cares then. I&amp;#39;ll stop posting about Rand Paul.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514543.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:01:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514543</guid><dc:creator>Aristophanes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514543.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514543</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Who cares?&amp;nbsp; Why is it a big deal?&amp;nbsp; Who would it be if it wasn&amp;#39;t him?&amp;nbsp; &lt;em&gt;Ron&lt;/em&gt; Paul?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514540.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:05:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514540</guid><dc:creator>Malachi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514540.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514540</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	why not? he (rand) is a conservative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why in the hell did Rand Paul vote to confirm Hagel?</title><link>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514532.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:47:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:514532</guid><dc:creator>shackleford</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/forums/thread/514532.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=197&amp;PostID=514532</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	If he keeps this up, then he&amp;#39;s not going to be the nominee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>