The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.
Forums
 »
Economics
 »
Political Theory
 »
Social Stability, Rule of Law, and the Free Society

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Social Stability, Rule of Law, and the Free Society

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 0 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous Posted: Thu, Dec 6 2012 10:01 AM


Social Stability, Rule of Law, and the Free Society

The voluntaryist’s suggestion ... is met with amusement at best, fury at worst. “The nation would devolve into perpetual struggles of one man against another!” critics cry out. If this is true, it may be a death blow to the idea that man can exist in peaceful, law-abiding voluntary relationships. Indeed, Hobbes would be right that man must be coercively controlled to rear in his savage nature. Is this what we must accept?
...
The central idea to take away is one of institutional incentives – We know that the public systematically desires rule of law – this is what is actually the cause of the stability in the system.
...
The conclusion of Jefferson is ever clearer – If men are angels, then we do not need coercive government; if they are not, we dare not have it

I hear it'll soon be a hit article. Be one of the first to read it and brag about it!

</shameless self-plug>

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 814
Points 14,875
Moderator
Reply
Physiocrat replied on Thu, Dec 6 2012 10:33 AM

Good piece Wheylous I enjoyed it. Democracy deserves a good thrashing.

However the point of some men being more good than needs to analysed in terms of other political systems otherwise the benevolent dictatorship is an option. Yet, the most prevalent argument I hear from those against voluntarism is statism is inevitable; some the universe is constructed in such a way that states will exist so we have to make the best of a bad job.

I know you weren't addressing this, just pointing out future lines of research. On it's own terms though it's a really good piece. And no I haven't seen that voter just yet!

 

The atoms tell the atoms so, for I never was or will but atoms forevermore be.

Yours sincerely,

Physiocrat

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous replied on Thu, Dec 6 2012 3:10 PM

Thanks!

I focused specifically on democracy because even minarchists envision some sort of democracy.

As to the benevolent dictator, the issue becomes how to get the right one into power.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 814
Points 14,875
Moderator
Reply
Physiocrat replied on Sat, Dec 8 2012 9:45 AM

I shared your article on facebook and had this exchange about it-

 

HIM- Read Stiglitz and you'll see there is no such thing as a free market - the opposite of democracy is oligarchy, not freedom. Markets create monopoly positions, which will exploit without recourse. This article is deeply naive.
 
ME-Would you like to provide a defence of democracy against any of the criticisms outlined in the article or suggest an alternative governance system which would be superior to democracy other than voluntarism?
 
HIM- No, because my criticism of extreme liberalism is the one I've detailed above. Any recourse to 'free markets', as this particular article uses as it's ideological underpinning is a recourse to dogma, not fact.

ME - The article does not provide an argument against aristocracy, benevolent dictatorship or communism which you are at liberty to defend. Despite obviously coming from a voluntarist view point his arguments about the nature of men, good or evil, and the implication for the justification for democratic governance system do not not depend on a voluntarist worldview. Consequently his arguments stand.

People are so blnkered it's almost unbelievable, they don't even address points you are making.

The atoms tell the atoms so, for I never was or will but atoms forevermore be.

Yours sincerely,

Physiocrat

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous replied on Sat, Dec 8 2012 1:08 PM

Haha, yeah, that happens. You really should challenge him on the topic of monopoly. Here are my resources:

http://candlemind.com/projects/progclub/file/michael/histmon.php

Essentially, bad monopolies do not exist in the free market for any significant amout of time. Take, for example, the time when US Steel tried to fix prices. The plan fell apart in a few weeks.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap