The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.
Forums
 »
Economics
 »
Economics Questions
 »
Why taxing everyone half a cent matters

Thank you for your participation and interest in the Mises Community. This software platform has seen its day, however, and so is now closed. We are redoing our entire site, so look for some exciting developments by the end of the year. Thank you for your support of Austrian economics, liberty, and peace.

Why taxing everyone half a cent matters

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous Posted: Thu, Aug 30 2012 9:02 PM

I had been wondering for a while "what if government taxes us all half a cent. Would that really create economic inefficiency? Surely half a cent will not make a dent in anyone's account. You can't get a Bruger for half a cent. You can't even get a paperclip for half a cent, likely."

I answered my own question:

It does matter. Why? Because just as the government can "collect" half-cents, so can private businesses. For example, imagine that an entrepreneur got half a cent from every single person in the US. That's more than $150 million! With that money he could start a gigantic business - or, he could enjoy himself for the rest of his life! In the case of the business, those half-cents that he collected together make a big, real difference - an ability to divert capital from other sectors of the economy.

So yes, even taxing one half-penny of everyone's wealth creates misallocation.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Reply
Clayton replied on Thu, Aug 30 2012 9:10 PM

ability to divert capital from other sectors of the economy


Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 871
Points 21,030
Reply
eliotn replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 8:08 AM

The issue is also how practical this would be.

Schools are labour camps.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
Reply
gotlucky replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 8:56 AM

Haha the costs alone of taxing everyone half a cent would make in incredibly cost ineffective.

LibertyHQ and its awesome forum.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator
Reply
DanielMuff replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 11:40 AM

Not if they charge an administrative fee of $49.99.

 

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
Reply
gotlucky replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 1:43 PM

Now you're thinking like a statist!

"We didn't raise taxes on you, you are only paying half a cent in taxes. See, that $49.99 fee is not a tax. So we couldn't have raised taxes on you."

LibertyHQ and its awesome forum.
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 48
Points 760
Reply
Maynard replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 3:08 PM

$.005 from each person in the US would not get you $150 million.  That would take $.50 from each person.

 

And of course the government taking just a little, is like playing "just the tip".

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 5:21 PM

Good catch. Wow. Yeah. It would be $1.5 million. That's still enough to start a good business.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 639
Points 11,575
Reply
cab21 replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 6:07 PM

a national government with 1.5 million in funding would have a rather poor defence ability.

if government got all money by donations, it would be getting billions if not trillians probaly. some church with 10% and 350 million members would be making trillions if its 10% gdp

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,984
Points 89,720
Reply
Wheylous replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 11:13 PM

a national government with 1.5 million in funding would have a rather poor defence ability.

That's not what I'm suggesting at all...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 639
Points 11,575
Reply
cab21 replied on Fri, Aug 31 2012 11:23 PM

so national defence, wise, are you suggesting a national defence means economic inefficency and misallocation?

is it the same if it's a .5 cent fee from citizens rather than called a tax?

does that make it different from a defence company charging .5 cent for each client?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap