<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">econbuff</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="4.1.40407.4157">Community Server</generator><updated>2008-03-07T10:42:00Z</updated><entry><title>Shoring up</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/11/21/shoring-up.aspx" /><id>/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/11/21/shoring-up.aspx</id><published>2008-11-21T14:05:00Z</published><updated>2008-11-21T14:05:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Why is it that I keep hearing the U.S. has the strongest economy in the world, but that it needs shoring up?&amp;nbsp; Seems like cognitive dissonance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=66258" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>econbuff</name><uri>http://mises.org/community/members/econbuff/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="economy" scheme="http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/tags/economy/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Water Markets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/05/14/water-markets.aspx" /><id>/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/05/14/water-markets.aspx</id><published>2008-05-14T13:03:00Z</published><updated>2008-05-14T13:03:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This &lt;a target="_blank" title="article" href="http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/05/13/water-electricity-industry-biz-energy-cx_bp_0514water.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in Forbes acknowledges that scarcity of water is leading to water markets, which will lead to more rational use of water.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;span id="lingo_span" class="lingo_region"&gt;...scarcity has already spawned
informal water markets in parts of Texas and Mexico. The prospect of
shortages has attracted a growing number of venture capital firms and
investment funds to place big bets on technologies aimed at
replenishing water supplies.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;span id="lingo_span" class="lingo_region"&gt;&amp;quot;Sooner or later, the way in
which the world adapts to shortages is with price,&amp;quot; says Levinson. &amp;quot;So
my expectation is that water is going to become increasingly costly as
an input for all kinds of purposes, and when that happens you&amp;#39;ll see a
lot more interest in conserving water.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=32894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>econbuff</name><uri>http://mises.org/community/members/econbuff/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="water" scheme="http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/tags/water/default.aspx" /><category term="scarcity" scheme="http://mises.org/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/tags/scarcity/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Crook County</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/03/07/crook-county.aspx" /><id>/community/blogs/econbuff/archive/2008/03/07/crook-county.aspx</id><published>2008-03-07T16:42:00Z</published><updated>2008-03-07T16:42:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This issue is a bit parochial, but typical of what goes on in many places.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The county board of Cook County in Illinois has decided to squeeze the taxpayers further with a full percentage point sales tax increase.&amp;nbsp; This will bring the tax rate in many of the Chicago suburbs to 10%.&amp;nbsp; Yes, we are now tithing to our masters in Illinois.&amp;nbsp; Poor Todd Stroger needs to hire 1,000 more patronage workers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch for folks making their purchases of big ticket items over in Lake County where the rate is a &amp;quot;mere&amp;quot; 7%, or order off the internet and come out ahead even with shipping costs. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of the outlying suburbs are contemplating seceding from the county.&amp;nbsp; Good luck.&amp;nbsp; This quote from the Chicago Tribune illustrates what a racket this really is:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, some suburban leaders doubt they will ever be free of Cook County.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Lincoln County proposal is going to be sort of hard to do,&amp;quot; said
McLeod, whose town competes with cheaper locales in Kane and Lake
Counties. &amp;quot;Sure, they can make some hay with it, but &lt;i&gt;the powers-that-be
aren&amp;#39;t going to let this area go&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;quot; (emphasis added.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://mises.org/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21371" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>econbuff</name><uri>http://mises.org/community/members/econbuff/default.aspx</uri></author></entry></feed>