The very existance of state-provided and/or monopolized services is a boon to cultural conflict over how those services are used and who gets to use them, since the individual must pay for them no matter what and has no real alternative to the singular provider of the service (I.E. the state). For example...
Posted to
Brainpolice
by
Brainpolice
on Sat, May 17 2008
Filed under: Coercive Monopoly, Competition, Aesthetics, Separatism, Free Association
Free association and competition resolves conflict while politics, especially democratic politics, enables and ultimately depends on conflict. All disagreements between people about how to organize can theoretically be resolved through free association, as they have the choice to either disassociate...
Posted to
Brainpolice
by
Brainpolice
on Wed, Apr 30 2008
Filed under: Competition, Decentralization, Centralization, Monopoly, Aesthetics, Democracy, Social Evolution, Consent, Free Association