The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Search

  • Re: If objective morality doesnt exist, what justifies libertarianism?

    [quote user="Lilburne"]empathy is a natural, evolved feature of the human psyche.[/quote] [quote user="Esuric"]That's just a fancy way to say it's been handed down to us by society. Unless you're saying it's genetic, somehow.[/quote] That's exactly what I'm saying. "A neurological approach to empathy"
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Lilburne on Tue, Nov 24 2009
  • Re: If objective morality doesnt exist, what justifies libertarianism?

    [quote user="Esuric"]And if monotheistic religion is the sole reason, then maybe we've been too quick to dismiss the virtues of such religions.[/quote] Are you implying the non-monotheistic ancient Greeks were devoid of morality? [quote user="Esuric"]The question, though, is why is it trans-societal?[/quote] Moral feelings are
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Lilburne on Tue, Nov 24 2009
  • Re: If objective morality doesnt exist, what justifies libertarianism?

    [quote user="nandnor"]The Lilburne manifesto and other answers just seemed to say "'cause it feels right". This seems like a mystical fantasy to me, not unlike any religion or cult. I think that having that as the basis for libertarianism puts it on the level of a religion, nothing else.[/quote] nandor, If you regularly refrained
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Lilburne on Tue, Nov 24 2009
  • Re: Austrian & Keynesian Theories Vs. Mathematical Facts

    DrKrbyLuv, Your theories are riven with fallacies, but you've been civil and mature. I regret that others here have not reciprocated, and have resorted to name-calling and the like. In doing so, they've managed to make a superior position look weak and flailing, and your fundamentally false position appears strong and serene in comparison. I
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Human Action Comics by Lilburne

    @ Chloe: Thank you for your kind words. :) @ E.R.: Glad you enjoyed issue #3. :) @ Conza: What's with the rage face? :) @ Smiling Dave: filc is correct that such an issue wouldn't really be apropos to this series, which is really about theory, not history. However, I'm sure I will touch briefly upon the Fed in a business cycle issue that
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Arguing with insults

    [quote user="Knight_of_BAAWA"]I don't care about your opinion on the matter.[/quote] Do you not care about the opinions of anybody on the matter, or only mine?
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Arguing with insults

    Smiling Dave, Thanks for that excellent distillation. [quote user="Smiling Dave"]1. If the goal is to raise the banner of AE in the world, insults are not the way to go. In fact it's immature to insult people [most of the time].[/quote] [quote user="Smiling Dave"]I'm clearly in the 1.camp.[/quote] Me too. [quote user="Smiling
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Arguing with insults

    [quote user="Snowflake"]Though this will change as I'm getting a spot on a radio show soon :P[/quote] Congratulations! You should make an announcement thread to share the details.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Arguing with insults

    [quote user="Knight_of_BAAWA"]Do you think that someone like Mr1001Bolsheviks is open for a rational discussion?[/quote] No. With such people, one should (a) make them look bad to the gallery by taking the high road and still shredding their position, (b) ignore them, or (c) ban them. In none of those cases does it do any good to degrade ourselves
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
  • Re: Arguing with insults

    [quote user="Knight_of_BAAWA"]Maybe some people prefer the government method of infantalizing others; I don't.[/quote] If anything infantilizes others, it is insults, because they only serve to elicit emotional responses, which is exactly the only kind of response infants are capable of.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Lilburne on Mon, Nov 23 2009
Page 1 of 80 (791 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » | More Search Options

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap