A moderator has privately claimed that I am guilty of "intellectual dishonesty." Can someone prove that I have been intentionally deceitful?
I definitely disagree with most of you. And, I'll even acknowledge that I've been playfully misanthropic (although, I just would've hoped for a less uptight audience).
But dishonest? That kind of hurt. Even replying as often as I can (and doing it more today than anyone else), I can't answer every single person or criticism. I am trying my best, and I have been very forthright (even conceding that I don't have a rock-solid macroeconomic explanation for widescale downturns).
liberty student, I believe you are the one being dishonest.
P.S. Seriously, guys, censorship on a forum dedicated to people like Mises? I know "moderation" means you can be selective, but I would assume we should err on the side of "freedom of speech," unless someone is spamming or trolling rather than engaging in argument.
If I wrote it more than a few weeks ago, I probably hate it by now.
To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."
Dondoolee:What thread is being referred too?