<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://mises.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Aristotelian Liberals</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Fellowship of Reason</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2610/35481.aspx#35481</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:59:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:35481</guid><dc:creator>wombatron</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2610/35481.aspx#35481</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/commentrss.aspx?PostID=35481</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.fellowshipofreason.com/Fellowship_of_Reason/Welcome.html" class="null"&gt;Fellowship of Reason&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone else heard about this group?&amp;nbsp; From what I can tell, they are a eudaimonist post-Objectivist group (my kind of people &lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;), with an emphasis on performing the roles traditionally performed by churches.&amp;nbsp; I think that this is very interesting as, although I am not religious, I have seen churches do a lot of good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Action as a Basic Axiom? (blog post)</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/5507/74135.aspx#74135</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:58:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:74135</guid><dc:creator>wombatron</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/5507/74135.aspx#74135</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/commentrss.aspx?PostID=74135</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technoeudaimonia.blogspot.com/2008/12/action-as-basic-axiom.html"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Just a little mental masturbation in my spare time &lt;img src="http://mises.org/Community/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" alt="Smile" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Foundationalism vs. Coherenticism</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2250/29519.aspx#29519</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:13:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:29519</guid><dc:creator>wombatron</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2250/29519.aspx#29519</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29519</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Which is the&amp;nbsp;better postition?&amp;nbsp; Is it a false dichomity? &amp;nbsp;The only epistemology that I have read in depth is Rand&amp;#39;s, and I think that it is one of the best parts of Objectivism.&amp;nbsp; However, I read Roderick Long criticizing her epistemology for being foundationalist instead of coherenticist.&amp;nbsp; I haven&amp;#39;t yet read his &lt;em&gt;Reason and Value&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp; What arguements does he make?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>A brief expose of neo-Aristotelian ethics</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/3253/44908.aspx#44908</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:11:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:44908</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/3253/44908.aspx#44908</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/commentrss.aspx?PostID=44908</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;For the benefit of fellow Aristotelians here, read &lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/blogs/veritasveritatum/archive/2008/08/03/explorations-in-teleocentric-forms-of-ethics.aspx"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and please offer any opinions, criticisms or suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Jon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Aristotelian ethics</title><link>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2436/33034.aspx#33034</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:54:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:33034</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/p/2436/33034.aspx#33034</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://mises.org/community/groups/aristotelian_liberals/forum/commentrss.aspx?PostID=33034</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wondering, in modern&amp;nbsp;metaethical debate would Aristotelianism count as a non-reductionist naturalistic form of realism that accepts&amp;nbsp;internalism? Or is it a&amp;nbsp;reductionist form of naturalism?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Jon&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>