The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Apolitical/Alternative Strategies

rated by 0 users
This post has 9 Replies | 9 Followers

Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,056
Points 78,245
Brainpolice Posted: Wed, May 21 2008 4:58 AM

This thread is for discussion or debate about apolitical strategies for the attainment of liberty involving social and/or economic means as opposed to political means. General concepts worth discussing are: civil disobedience, direct action, secession (with emphasis on individual secession), agorism, participatory democracy, spontaneous order, social evolution, implications of the calculation problem to the sustainability of the state in the long-term, defeating the state inside of your head, the familial roots of the state, education and possible beneficial cultural climates for liberty.

You're also welcome to vote in the poll about agorism:

What do you think about Agorism?

 

  • Agorism is a silly and futile strategy for liberty that will be crushed by the state (5%)
  • Agorism is a strategy that should be used side by side with the political process (20%)
  • Agorism is the best theory for libertarian strategy, but it's part of a larger framework (65%)
  • Agorism is exclusively the only proper libertarian strategy (10%)
  • Total Votes: 20

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 295
Points 4,565

I voted for "larger framework" on a very close call against "only method". There are legitimate and productive methods outside the agora, but their context and applicability is severly constrained.

Brainpolice:
defeating the state inside of your head

That's what my sig is about.

The state won't go away once enough people want the state to go away, the state will effectively disappear once enough people no longer care that much whether it stays or goes. We don't need a revolution, we need millions of them.

  • Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,056
Points 78,245

So far it seems that there is unanimous consensus about agorism then. :P

  • Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,090
Moderator

Brainpolice:

So far it seems that there is unanimous consensus about agorism then. :P

Indeed, while I am sure that Agorism is the most sound strategy available to us, it is neither the end all be all nor entirley perfect (the class theory being an example of not entirley perfect, but important nonetheless).

There is also the odd chance that dismatnling leviathian in tadem of Agora somehow worked, but I remain skeptical at such, as I think it would create a new set of adversaries eventually down the line with minarchists; some might actually concede per their word, but I could imagine enough not doing so to pose a problem.

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 901
Points 15,900
wombatron replied on Thu, Jul 24 2008 1:33 AM

As I have said before, I do support some political action in tandem with agorism and apolitical methods.  I think of it as a way of bribing the state, to keep it off the back of the newly-born alternative institutions.

Market anarchist, Linux geek, aspiring Perl hacker, and student of the neo-Aristotelians, the classical individualist anarchists, and the Austrian school.

  • Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 337
Points 4,895
Nick. B replied on Thu, Nov 27 2008 7:55 AM

Well I believe we should use alternative methods (such agorism) along with the political process. At least until we gain some momentum, then we should gradually ween ourselves off from governmet interaction. But us being a political power is a little bit, so we should use both options simultaneosly til then

  • Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 304
Points 5,160
I don't think agorism or really any kind of activism is (short-term) effective at promoting or increasing liberal ideas; largely because people are stupid and don't want to hear it. Apoliticism is not self-destructive like political liberalism is, but it's very unlikely to make a difference without a lot of historical accidents. I certainly do not expect a liberal or stateless form of organization in my life time (beyond my own personal life), and I am far more interested in looking out for myself than I am in promoting liberalism. I'm attracted to liberalism and markets intellectually, but I think anyone who thinks of it as more than a hobby (at least in our life times) is deluded.
...
  • Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 129
Points 2,100
Bill replied on Thu, Dec 9 2010 9:04 PM
I voted for part of a larger strategy rather than the only one. Simply because I believe we will have to close Pandora's box slowly
  • Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285
Hey, how exactly do you put a poll up, anyways?
  • Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Mon, Nov 5 2012 8:18 PM
Like he did, in the OP
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
| RSS