The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Freedom Images...

This post has 100 Replies | 16 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

Harry Felker:
if the majority decide that the competition is not desirable, they will cause a civil war scenario by virtue of the "National" aspect, then we are back to square one...

I'm talking about a constitutional republic, not a democracy.

DD5:
I assumed that he is advocating some sort of a hypothetical constitutional ban on coercion of any type.  I neglected the impracticality of such absolute restrictions in a mini-archist society.

Strawman.  I'm talking about a government whose only job is to protect people against the initiation of force and fraud.  I find this criticism odd, in that it seems to apply more to Anarcho-Capitalism (If Government = Force, then isn't Anarchy, by definition a "ban on force"?) than Minarchism.

Honestly, I could go either way (Minarchism, or Anarcho-Capitalism).  As long as I get to be more free, it's all good.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PS:

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,094
Points 65,835
Moderator

malgratloprekindle:
(If Government = Force, then isn't Anarchy, by definition a "ban on force"?)
your simplistic equation is hopelessly and irredeemably  reductive, and wrong. so naturaly it leads you to a false conclusion

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

nirgrahamUK:
malgratloprekindle:
(If Government = Force, then isn't Anarchy, by definition a "ban on force"?)
your simplistic equation is hopelessly and irredeemably  reductive, and wrong. so naturaly it leads you to a false conclusion

Prove it.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

<--Benefits of economic freedom (Red = least economically free; while dark green = most economically free)

<---Value of our dollar as a % of the original 1776 $ vs. time

<- Technically not relavent, but who doesn't like the thought of this? :P And if it works for a group like PETA, then why not? XD

<- For cheap yuks

<-Advice Keynes

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 962
Points 15,345
Conza88 replied on Fri, Jul 10 2009 11:32 PM

Why is there now a considerable amount of bs in my thread? Tongue Tied

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 142
Points 2,120
Praetyre replied on Fri, Jul 10 2009 11:38 PM

Am I the only one who can only see the thought-chain-breaking, Uncle Sam STHU and Conza88's avatar, the rest being red xs?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

Because I was offended, stressed, and therefore needed to burn off some steam.  This appearently set off a flame war between myself and the Anarcho-Capitalists.

By the way, I just realized that I have a bunch of images saved onto my computer that I keep trying to upload into this forum (they're relavent and are awesome too! Big Smile).  I tried to add them in my last post using the "add media" button.  After much fiddling and waiting trying to get them all added, I only could get one to display (the one about dissent).  Now when I try to get added, for some reason it displays a broken page icon, instead of the image.  Does anyone know how to get around this?

I've just tried renaming them.  I'll see if that works (edit): it didn't...Fuck...If anyone knows a way around this, please post it here, or message me. X_X

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

Praetyre:
Am I the only one who can only see the thought-chain-breaking, Uncle Sam STHU and Conza88's avatar, the rest being red xs?

Yah.  Only I don't even see the Red X's...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

Woo-ho!

The images work now! Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

OK, I just reedited my huge picture post above with even more pictures.  Hope it's to everyone's liking. Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 269
Points 4,610
John Ess replied on Sat, Jul 11 2009 5:56 PM

"Liberal guilt complex."

 

A bit hamfisted and over the top.  Are you anti-semitic/black or is that supposed to be ironic or funny or something?

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

John Ess:
A bit hamfisted and over the top.  Are you anti-semitic/black or is that supposed to be ironic or funny or something?

I'm niether anti-semitic or racist.  It was supposed to be ironic/funny making fun of certain liberals.  If I went too far, I'll remove it.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 128
Points 1,875

After more consideration, I decided to remove the picture.

I'm sorry to anyone whom I offended.  That was not my intention.  I was merely poking fun at the liberals who take it too far.

Peace.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 740
Points 11,565

malgratloprekindle:
We can still own guns and defend ourselves.

That sir depends on the State you live in, and your record...

malgratloprekindle:
*facepalm* try 200 years for the USA and about 300 for Rome (if even that).

I consider the fall of the American Republic with the Civil War... not 1976...

The US fell a long time ago

malgratloprekindle:
Prove it.

How many invasions have we had to deal with?????  Historical record shows even at our weakest (Reconstruction Era) we managed to remain unattractive as a target...

malgratloprekindle:
Prove it.

I did in my response to another that youe quoted...

It sounds like the ocean, smells like fresh mountain air, and tastes like the union of peanut butter and chocolate. ~Liberty Student

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 740
Points 11,565

malgratloprekindle:
I'm talking about a constitutional republic, not a democracy.

Show me one that lasted more than a century and you might have a point, until then, your constitutional republic is a flawed concept as it allows the Government to dictate the rules it follows, if I make my own rules and everyone else has to obey arbitrary ones I dictate to them, why am I an evil ruler, and the government (which does the same thing), in a Con Rep, a good thing???

 

malgratloprekindle:
I'm talking about a government whose only job is to protect people against the initiation of force and fraud. 

Utopian if you think it will end its power there, it will use that principle (Like Dems and Public Welfare / Reps and National Security) to be just as oppressive and eventually further that what we have today (as this system will be)...

malgratloprekindle:

I find this criticism odd, in that it seems to apply more to Anarcho-Capitalism (If Government = Force, then isn't Anarchy, by definition a "ban on force"?) than Minarchism.

Well your comparison is off...

Government = Force

Minarchism = Force

Anarchism = Not Force

It is not a "ban on force" as you say, but has no authority that is legitimized in using force, Government's ban force all the time, just not banning themselves from the use of force, just us peons, from using it on them...

It sounds like the ocean, smells like fresh mountain air, and tastes like the union of peanut butter and chocolate. ~Liberty Student

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 962
Points 15,345
Conza88 replied on Tue, Jul 14 2009 8:55 PM

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 294
Points 5,845

Hahaha!!! The last one is a very graphical example of the effects of minimum-wage laws. Excellent!!!

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 11
Points 160
kurlare replied on Wed, Jul 15 2009 12:30 AM

Those were all very enjoyable but that last one is really special!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 962
Points 15,345
Conza88 replied on Sat, Aug 8 2009 2:27 AM

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 142
Points 1,760
Mlee replied on Sat, Aug 8 2009 3:21 AM

My only problem with the above is that it doesn't look like Karl Marx. 

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 4 of 6 (101 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next > | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap