We all know that most of our peers do not agree with our political ideals. In my experience, their views are usually based on compassion, ultimately. They see our philosophy as leaving out the poor. They think that the poor would starve without the government, etc. We've all heard the claims.
Any argument I offer against positive rights is usually met with the “what about the poor” response. Arguments that government intervention works against the poor usually meets with incredulity. They equate “the left” with compassion and the free-market with coldness.
It is true that we hear more rhetoric on the poverty issue from the left. Most of us would agree, however, that freedom and private property are the friends of the poor. My concern is that we libertarians don’t stress this issue enough, and it is precisely the one that undermines our position with most people (in my experience). The concerns we voice usually relate to rights infringements and oppression, or government inefficiency. I think that it would be most helpful to take aim at the poverty/compassion issue.
So, I want to look deeper into this. Does anyone know of any good literature on this? I did take a look at Hazlitt’s “The Conquest of Poverty” and it is great (despite that the stats are a little dated).
You'd have to ask - why are the poor, poor? Government regulation of such things as minimum wage laws and unions creates unemployment. Taxes also dissuade employment creation.
I haven't read MvWS, but it probably has what you're looking for:
http://mises.org/books/manwelfarestate.pdf
Rothbard's "For a new Liberty"
http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp
Which I also have not read probably is what you're looking as well.
yeah, Rothbards "For a New Liberty:..." provides statistics showing how the State's intervention and thus the so called "Welfare State" has cause way more harm than good.
"I used to see a mountain as a mountain.. Thereafter.. when I saw a mountain; lo! it was not a mountain.. yet now of final tranquillity: I see a mountain just as a mountain as I used to.." - Master Yuan; molon labe
Ask them if instead of spending money on government programs to help the poor if the poor shouldn't have the choice of simply taking it as money.
If they say no denounce them for paternalism and using power to control the poor's lives.
Microsecession as a strategy for revolution | Challenge to minarchist | How would a private road system work?
Stranger: Ask them if instead of spending money on government programs to help the poor if the poor shouldn't have the choice of simply taking it as money. If they say no denounce them for paternalism and using power to control the poor's lives.
That's a good one. I used that one on somebody the other day actually. I said to them why don't we just give the poor the money ourselves. We could even call it a charity, plenty of those around. It baffled the other individual. They moved onto another topic. That usually means now they have to think about it more and you shattered their static perspective, which is a good thing.
Ask them what they do for the poor.
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"
Bob Dylan
GilesStratton: Ask them what they do for the poor.
Bring up government legislation, which puts a gun at your head, then pat themselves on the back saying what good people they are, of course. That's real compassion and making a difference
Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic
-Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own
So compassionate they give other people's money.
I don't understand how people can be so dense! Government was never invented to feed the poor. It was created to feed itself. Until you understand that, you are not going to understand how anarchy works.
"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable."
It goes to show how great the left is at propaganda. There is no way someone could rationaly confuse leftist thought with genuine compassion, yet somehow leftist propaganda has worked well to perpetuate that myth. The propaganda they have is probably among the best and most effective ever established.
Watch or listen to this
http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=author&ID=1192
It is the antidote for bleeding heart leftism.
If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North
Sphairon:
Wait, does this person love or hate strangers?
Schools are labour camps.
People on the left tend to see the economy as a static, zero-sum game, where the rich "hoard" the wealth and the poor have to sell their labor to them to get a small slice of it back. But the laborers produce more wealth than they are paid, so the evil capitalists just get richer and richer! Oh, the humanity!
Of course, there are have been a great number of responses to these fallacious arguments, especially by Austrians. I've compiled some of them here:
http://corktageous.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-i-am-not-mutualist.html
Long story short: their arguments don't hold water.
mitcjm:I think that it would be most helpful to take aim at the poverty/compassion issue.
I wholeheartedly agree. It is this precise issue, which ultimately convinced me that my formerly held leftist views were wrong and that a free-market capitalist society is superior to a society based on a socialist system. Once I realized that the "well-intentioned" welfare-state policies in fact had destructive consequences, I changed my views.
Indeed.
2Pac: "Memories of a past time/givin up cash/to the leaders/knowing damn well they ain't gon feed us"
The difference between libertarianism and socialism is that libertarians will tolerate the existence of a socialist community, but socialists can't tolerate a libertarian community.
Given that so many people obviously care for the poor (for a given definition of "poor"), surely removing regulation and taxation would free them up so they can decide directly how to help out. Is that not the purest form of democracy - letting the individual decide how to allocate welfare for the poor?
Of course this approach often exposes the hypocrisy of those who bring up the "poor" as an argument against free markets.
Base model cars of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but quarter-mile races.
I think a vote for leftism, is admitting you are incapable or unwilling of solving a problem and you want to pass the buck to someone else, while still seeming "smart, edgy, and making a difference" to your peers and the person you passed the buck to as an evil son of a bitch. It really is a brilliant little way to go about life.
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap