Hi Austrian folks,
It's been a long time since my last visit to this Forum - doesn't mean that my interest on the subject has declined...
When challenged by interventionists, we (i.e. free-market advocates) tend to stick mainly to technical - and sometimes lengthy - explanations, and our opponents tend to deviate towards the emotional side of things, and the debate normally ends up like this: no progress with respect to the diffusion of the free-market ideas.
Thinking about this, I've been wandering about the possibility to compile some kind of "wiki"-inspired quick reference database to help us debate concisely and consistently, something like an "FAQ" on the subject.
It could be structured in a similar fashion as one of my favorite engineering tools: a "troubleshooting chart".
The idea could start as shown on the table below, intended as an example (please note I'm a layman in Economics, having learnt the little I know today only through reading on Mises.org; should you find any imprecise info, disregard it and replace with the right clarification):
Free Market Troubleshooting Chart (nice title, isn't it??)
Issues encountered
Operational Cause(s)
Underlying/ Root cause(s):
Countermeasure(s)
Walls around private land and buildings are partially destroyed, vandalized and smeared with ugly graffiti and silly left-revolutionary slogans
No risk of punishment for the violation of property rights
Poor to none enforcement of property rights as a disguised form to implement/ stimulate collectivism
To legally enforce and/ or restore property rights
To provide efficient (private) police to ensure enforcement
Vandalizing the other’s property deemed justifiable by the “class struggle” and similar fallacies
Anticapitalistic mentality instilled by public school and mainstream media
To abolish public school and indoctrination
To implement private education and instill the non-aggression principle
Peddlers wandering all over, aggressively asking for money and disturbing the passers-by (a.k.a. taxpayers)
General impoverishment due to taxing, inflation, regulation and restrictions to the free market
Central banking policies and issuing of fiat money
To abolish central banking
To adopt “hard” money standard
Internal and external trade restrictions
To abolish trade restrictions
High taxes throughout all the economy
To abolish taxes
Massive rural migration into the cities
Heavy sales taxing on agricultural products
Lack of incentive to agricultural economic activities
To deregulate agriculture business
Price controls and subsidies
To abolish price controls and subsidies
Lack of credit for investment
To abolish government planning and control of agricultural credit and transfer the credit function to the free market banking sector
High unemployment within the less schooled groups
Increasing illiteracy, poor education
To abolish public school
To implement private education
Unionizing, licensing, regulation
To abolish compulsory unionizing, to deregulate the labor market
Easy living on charity rather than struggling for life with a low-pay job
High indirect costs for potential employers to hire low-qualification workers
To abolish welfare system and high associated labor costs
Minimum wages preventing employers from hiring low-qualification workers at wages higher than their marginal productive capacity
To abolish minimum wage laws
Loss of self-esteem and human dignity
Dehumanization and devoiding of the human status through the rejection of moral values and deconstruction of family, while glorifying the State as a substitute with respect to family as a nucleus of society
Hmmm, difficult one…
My personal opinion: to stop State indoctrination which destroys family values and to stop inhibiting the potential, voluntary use of religion (within each belief group) as moral inspiration for the individual recovery
Massive propaganda on the “evils” of capitalism and the “human right” to live at the other’s expenses
To abolish public school and state indoctrination
To implement private education and propagate the basics of free-market economics
Streets full of potholes, cracks
Poor street maintenance owing to inefficient public street management
Corruption in public services
To deregulate and privatize street management
Lack of incentives to work efficiently (stability of public jobs)
Lack of price incentive and competition
Water and sewage leaks on the streets and sidewalks; mix-up of rainwater drainage and sewer systems
Poor installation and maintenance of water, drainage and sewer systems owing to inefficient public management
To deregulate and privatize water, drainage and sewer services
Proliferation of “favelas” (lumberyards)
Chronic urban housing deficit
Zoning laws and building restrictions
To abolish zoning laws and restrictions
Environmental protection areas established to ensure privileges for interest groups
To abolish environmental regulations and to establish property rights on the “commons”
Lack of incentive for investment in housing
To deregulate housing and mortgage systems
Lack of credit due to excessively high mortgage rates
Traffic jams throughout the whole urban area
Insufficient/ inappropriate traffic ways (streets, tunnels etc.)
State monopoly on these resources
To abolish State monopoly and enable private investment on traffic ways
Poor collective transportation means (bus, subway)
Low incentive for businesses to invest in transportation due to State regulation, price control, concessions etc.
To abolish State licensing and to deregulate concessions, routes and all other parameters, and to allow for competition between service providers
High cost of taxis/ car services
Heavy taxing, unionizing and State licensing and legislation to operate the service
Excess of vehicles with respect to the available resources
Low incentive for car users to prefer other transportation means
To improve alternative transportation means as stated on the previous items
To be expanded “ad libitum”
This could grow to cover all aspects of daily life and economics-related matters, and we would try to use this as an additional tool for making the pro-free-market view more understandable to the public in general.
I'd appreciate any (civilized) comments on this subject.
Kind regards from Brazil,
R. Halevy
Rio de Janeiro.
as a general reference to keep arguments straight it could work. but for actually arguing it leaves out the justification for calling things root causes.
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap