Hi
I was just reading the United States v. Microsoft case on Wikipeda. It mentioned the Sherman Act, which is some anti-Monopoly law.
So I was wondering, if the Monopolies are illegal, then what about Government? Or how about Religion? Or to get into some specific within Government;
And the list would go on for at least a page.
Perhaps someone can finish the list for me?
Anyways, back on topic!
So the difference between these Government and (at least in the past) Religion monopolies compared to monopolies such as the aforementioned case, is that with the aforementioned case Microsoft wasn't holding a forced monopoly. However Government and (at least in the past) Religion are/were holding monopolies forcibly.
So why doesn't the Sherman Act apply to those aforementioned monopolies? Once again, it appears that the Government is above the law.
What are your thoughts on this?
Also, I can follow this thought process much further, but I don't want to repeat what someone has already said before, so if there are any articles already out there saying the same thing I am saying (or similiar) then can you please tell me where to find it otherwise I will write an article about this.
Thanks,
Panarchy
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap