The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Bureaucracy?

rated by 0 users
This post has 7 Replies | 4 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 105
Strapko Posted: Thu, Oct 2 2008 2:26 PM

Hey guys, I have a simple question: Is there a such a thing as a private bureaucracy?

  • | Post Points: 80
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,810
Points 27,770
Moderator
MVP

Strapko:

Hey guys, I have a simple question: Is there a such a thing as a private bureaucracy?

Family, epsecially on holiday. 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,608
Points 46,165

A bureaucracy is what you get when you are so far away from your agents that you cannot trust them to do what you need them to, and thus impose upon them a set of rules to follow.

They then become rules-obeyers instead of market participants.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 555
Points 13,730

Yes, Toyota prides itself in its structured bureaucracy.  They are a private enterprise(for the most part), hence a private bureaucracy.


Bureaucracy can happen at many levels, in governments, or even small organizations.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 91
Points 1,375
Moderator

Simple answer: Yes, very much so.

As such any organisation will have it. You would, for instance, not have a functioning legal/judicial system without it, anarcho-capitalism or not. Also, a system of private ownership of the means of production implies a hierarchy, ab initio, and thus bureaucracy.

This is not to say that bureaucracy is necessarily a good thing, nor that private bureaucracy = public bureaucracy. Indeed, depending on the setup, a bureaucracy can be so as to effectively place proper responsibility within the hierarchy or so as to hide proper responsibility. However, where it is possible to avoid a malfunctioning private bureaucracy, it is, following any standard definition, quite the opposite for most public bureaucracies. Now, whether or not any bureaucracy whatsoever tends towards malfunctioning is an entirely different matter. Look it up on Wikipedia for more references including Max Weber et al. Additionally, look up "The Peter Principle". Personally I'm somewhat undecided about its general applicability, but interesting it is nonetheless.

Not Ranked
Posts 3
Points 105
Strapko replied on Thu, Oct 2 2008 9:06 PM

Thanks for the responses guys.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 35
Points 650

Didn't like the responses on RPF's?  These responses are very similar to the ones over there.  ha!  Oh well.  Stubborness is awesome. Wink

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,503
Points 28,705
Moderator

From the dictionary:

1 a: a body of nonelective government officials b: an administrative policy-making group2: government characterized by specialization of functions, adherence to fixed rules, and a hierarchy of authority3: a system of administration marked by officialism, red tape, and proliferation

My AP Gov class disagreed though. Bureaucracy was defined as any kind of hierarchical system of organizing things, or something like that.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap