What does Austrian economics offer for people not going into political economics in school?
I've always wondered this and find it true with almost every school of thought. If all your focus is on political economics, by the way, what exactly are you going to do but work for the government?
The Origins of Capitalism
And for more periodic bloggings by moi,
Leftlibertarian.org
A surefire way to anger socialists.
-Jon
The chill that you feel is the herald of your doom! Irenicus' Diaries.
I guess I'm not really separated from political economy, but I suppose I'd say that people from lots of different disciplines need a firm foundation in economics in order to do what they want to do well. That's certainly true of ethics and political philosophy, especially when you move towards applications.
http://libertarian-left.blogspot.com/
Niccolò:What does Austrian economics offer for people not going into political economics in school?
Well, it tastes great and is less filling.
Stuff you can do to further libertarianism (please contribute!)
Well, I have my own think tank. .... Someday it will rule the Earth - in an anarchic way. - Roderick Long
It teaches you how the world really works, which is useful knowledge.
But I see your point. Political science and economics are largely academic disciplines with very little utility in the private sector. However, I think all people need a basic understanding of economics, just as all people should know basic biology or mathematics.
How many people would support unions if they knew the praxeological impact of their restrictions? In that sense, economics is directly relevant to the real world.
The government will hire me if I tell them I read a few Rothbard and Mises books? Not likely.
Austrian economics is a method, not any specific body of knowledge. It grants the skill to analyze social organization.
What you do afterwards is make your own way in life.
Microsecession as a strategy for revolution | Challenge to minarchist | How would a private road system work?
Austrian Economics is also a way of thinking about things that will constantly allow a person to think critically and correctly about life at large. Understanding the value of the individual is something that Rand pointed out with her Objectivism and is something that when applied to daily life is one of the most useful tools I have in my arsenal.
Why is it that the state favours neoclassical economcics? Is it merely the fact that the methodology of the Austrian school focuses on the individual?
"The relationship between libertarianism and conservatism is one of praxeological compatibility, sociological complementarity, and reciprocal reinforcement"
Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe
GilesStratton: Why is it that the state favours neoclassical economcics? Is it merely the fact that the methodology of the Austrian school focuses on the individual?
It produces a lot of highly sophisticated, irrelevant conclusions, allowing the state to appear as though it is a patron for science while at the same time not being threatened by the results.
It can help investors and entrepreneurs make better decisions.
Niccolò: What does Austrian economics offer for people not going into political economics in school? I've always wondered this and find it true with almost every school of thought. If all your focus is on political economics, by the way, what exactly are you going to do but work for the government?
I recall that Rothbard actually wrote something to the effect that there would be far less demand for economists in a free market, as opposed to a statist society. End of EoL, maybe?
Market anarchist, Linux geek, aspiring Perl hacker, and student of the neo-Aristotelians, the classical individualist anarchists, and the Austrian school.
I think it's in the Chapter 22 where has writes that the state needs intellectuals to deceive people about its nature and that intellectuals need the state because there wouldn't be demand for them in the free market.
Jon Irenicus: A surefire way to anger socialists. -Jon
If that was a paying job I'm pretty sure you'd be a millionaire.
Mises Community Natural Rights Discussion Group
Yeah, I call it "reaching out".
With regard to the question on neoclassical economics, it has to do with its methodology. Rather than come up with theories that have a sound basis, the neoclassical economist can easily reject theories with unwanted conclusions. Economics came about originally as a tool for solving public policy concerns, but a lot of its theorems were not to the liking of the elite. Neoclassical economics, by shirking the axiomatic-deductive method, frees itself of this "limitation".
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap