The present value of future cash flows.
Say I have an apartment that I can rent out for $10 a year, and that by 5 years, it will be "used up" (a bit unrealistic, but bear with me)
So, the present value of the apartment should be $10 x 5 = $50, BUT, since people value $5 in the future less than $5 right now, the value will not be $50, but always less. How much less depends on the interest rate (the rents are discounted by dividing by the interest rate).
I wrote an article on the discounted cashflow paradox. The problem with discounted cashflow pricing is "What rate should I discount at?"
In the present, it's hard to accurately price capital, due to State distortions of the capital market and credit market.
For example, does it pay to borrow at 6% to buy an apartment building for renting. If there's going to be an inflationary boom, then that's a profitable investment. If the money supply crashes, you may find yourself unable to repay your mortgage. When FRE and FNM play leverage tricks, they always qualify for a bailout. As an individual, you won't have Ben Bernanke personally rushing to your aid when you default on your mortgage.
If you predict that we're at the start of a boom phase, then it pays to borrow and buy. If we're at the start of a bust phase, then it pays to sell and deleverage. You're not an insider, so you can't predict what's going to happen. Plus, insiders *ALWAYS* qualify for a bailout when they bet wrong.
I have my own blog at FSK's Guide to Reality. Let me know if you like it.
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap