The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

In layman's term...Capital Value

Latest post Mon, Jul 21 2008 9:16 AM by fsk. 2 replies.
  • Fri, Jul 18 2008 11:59 PM

    • Dylangal
    • Top 500 Contributor
      Female
    • Joined on Thu, Jul 10 2008
    • Brooklyn
    • Posts 5
    • Points 205

    In layman's term...Capital Value

    I have Rothbard's Econ 101 lectures and I've lisened to it once, (but my iTunes, gives some funny error when I try to play it, and I can't find the CD right now) so could someone explain exact what it is? Thanks.
    • Post Points: 35
  • Sat, Jul 19 2008 6:31 AM In reply to

    • Zlatko
    • Top 200 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on Sun, Dec 30 2007
    • Posts 30
    • Points 435

    Re: In layman's term...Capital Value

    The present value of future cash flows.

    Say I have an apartment that I can rent out for $10 a year, and that by 5 years, it will be "used up" (a bit unrealistic, but bear with me)

    So, the present value of the apartment should be $10 x 5 = $50, BUT, since people value $5 in the future less than $5 right now, the value will not be $50, but always less. How much less depends on the interest rate (the rents are discounted by dividing by the interest rate).

    • Post Points: 5
  • Mon, Jul 21 2008 9:16 AM In reply to

    • fsk
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on Wed, Jun 4 2008
    • Posts 347
    • Points 5,635

    Re: In layman's term...Capital Value

    I wrote an article on the discounted cashflow paradox.  The problem with discounted cashflow pricing is "What rate should I discount at?"

    In the present, it's hard to accurately price capital, due to State distortions of the capital market and credit market.

    For example, does it pay to borrow at 6% to buy an apartment building for renting.  If there's going to be an inflationary boom, then that's a profitable investment.  If the money supply crashes, you may find yourself unable to repay your mortgage.  When FRE and FNM play leverage tricks, they always qualify for a bailout.  As an individual, you won't have Ben Bernanke personally rushing to your aid when you default on your mortgage.

    If you predict that we're at the start of a boom phase, then it pays to borrow and buy.  If we're at the start of a bust phase, then it pays to sell and deleverage.  You're not an insider, so you can't predict what's going to happen.  Plus, insiders *ALWAYS* qualify for a bailout when they bet wrong.

    I have my own blog at FSK's Guide to Reality. Let me know if you like it.

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap