The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Historical Tax Burdens in the United States

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 77
Points 1,385
Parsidius Posted: Fri, May 16 2008 10:08 PM

I've been looking for information concerning the historical tax burdens in the United States in terms of GDP or national income from as early as possible, but so far haven't found anything on Google or the like. Would anyone happen to have any online resources on this subject, by any chance?

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,654
Points 56,830
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

I think Hoppe gives some sources in Democracy - the God that Failed.

-Jon

The chill that you feel is the herald of your doom! Irenicus' Diaries.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 113
Points 2,020
Remnant replied on Wed, May 21 2008 5:19 AM

 

It would also be interesting to know what the tax burden was on pre revolutionary America.  And what was the tax rate on tea that prompted the Boston Tea Party? 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 858
Points 15,005

I thought the British Bottom* tea was subsidized and was cheaper than what the privateers could import which was a large part of the friction that lead to it getting tossed into river. The instigators were businessmen and importers after all...

Now the Stamp Act was a direct tax that the colonies protested against and basically ignored.

*Whatever it was actually called, the law that said that all trade through the colonies had to be in British ships to keep the other countries from engaging in direct trade with them.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 387
Points 6,010
Paul replied on Wed, May 21 2008 6:38 AM

Remnant:

It would also be interesting to know what the tax burden was on pre revolutionary America.  And what was the tax rate on tea that prompted the Boston Tea Party? 

You get wildly different answers depending where you look.  Common claims I've heard range from 1% to 10%, with 3% being about average.   Poking around a bit, Google answers says the tax wasn't a % but a fixed amount of 3d/lb; Wikipedia says there were 90,000 lbs of tea thrown overboard and that it was worth £10,000, so a pound of tea was worth 2/2⅔ (i.e., 26⅔ pence): assuming that's after tax, 3d/lb comes to about 12⅔% rate.  (Ah...it's clear that it was 3d per pound weight of tea, but perhaps someone thought it was 3d/£ and miscalculated that as 3% - would explain where that figure comes from; but the correct amount would be 1.25% at 240d/£ in predecimal currency)

μὴ παραχώρει τοῖς κακος ἀλλ' εὐτολμώτερον ἀντιβάδιζε.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 89
Points 1,720

You may want to check out this paper, particularly table 11.2.  I do not think you are going to find studies of the historical tax burdens in the US as terms of GDP going back before 1929, but I could be wrong: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5981.pdf

Historically, and during colonial times, Americans paid little taxes since huge share of Federal Revenue came from tariffs. This paper gives a short synopsis: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005921.html

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap