I was wondering if anyone has attempted to correlate Austrian-style economic history of the United States with historical generations theory. Typical examples of this are the books "Generations" and "The Fourth Turning" by Strauss and Howe. They divide US history into phases called "Turnings", led by archetype generations ("Boomer", "GI", "Missionary" and the like). They appear to make a convincing case for a four-generation cycle in social and political history (or maybe it only works because we have a propensity for getting into wars every 80 years or so!). Their Turnings do not align with the spurious Kondratieff Cycles, except in the early 19th century. But since Rothbard provided a reasonable explanation for the Kondratieff cycles many years ago (in that case, demonstrating that they were merely a temporary correlation in the 1800s, not a real cyclic phenomena), I wondered if similar arguments had been advanced for generations, which would at least seem to have a sociological rationale for their existence.
Steve