The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

ABCT Question

rated by 0 users
This post has 2 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 81
Points 2,755
miksirhc Posted: Sun, Apr 20 2008 8:19 PM

According to ABCT,  investments made will be malinvestments because (correct me if I'm wrong) there are not enough resources to carry the long-term projects through.   Basically, there is investment without the saving necessary to see these investments through.

So my question is, what needs to be saved? Capital? What types of capital? And how is this necessary to make projects profitable? Also, how does the monetary unit represent this type of capital?

I'm not lazy, I just have a high time preference.
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 858
Points 14,975

miksirhc:
So my question is, what needs to be saved?

I think it's a lot clearer if you look at 'saving' as 'deferred consumption'.

 

 

 

Oh, and ignore this...etoy.Container

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 510
Points 9,450
JAlanKatz replied on Tue, Apr 22 2008 7:41 PM

miksirhc:

According to ABCT,  investments made will be malinvestments because (correct me if I'm wrong) there are not enough resources to carry the long-term projects through.   Basically, there is investment without the saving necessary to see these investments through.

So my question is, what needs to be saved? Capital? What types of capital? And how is this necessary to make projects profitable? Also, how does the monetary unit represent this type of capital?

 

 I've always looked at it (perhaps incorrectly) in terms of money.  When there is inflation, the interest rate falls, and businesses borrow money.  A lower interest rate usually means people are saving money, so that the businesses expect current consumption to fall, but later consumption to increase - and in particular, people to buy things with a longer production cycle.  So, they stop making candy and start making refrigerators.  Obviously this is very oversimplified, but you get the idea.

However, since this is a different situation, what's actually happened is that current consumption is up, and savings are down.  So candy goes up in price, since the supply fell but demand rose - and later, refrigerators come to market and don't find buyers, since savings are down.  Then refrigerator companies are in trouble, so they lay off workers, take losses, etc.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap