All the statists and Keynesians will look up and shout "Save Us!" and I'll wisper "No."
Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves.
Microsecession as a strategy for revolution | Challenge to minarchist | How would a private road system work?
I can't hold it against them to such a degree when they're ignorant of the alternative. As for people who know about libertarianism and reject it, they will feel my argumentative wrath. :p
I do my best to educate. Usually when a situation comes up that's related to the studies here, such as matters business, economic, government, political, etc...
The appeal to "charity" is a truly ironic one. First, it is hardly "charity" to take wealth by force and hand it over to someone else. -Rothbard
The Late Andrew Ryan:I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil?
They aren't evil. It is a vicious game when you start to focus on your family and friends, who are largely ignorant of the consequences of the ideas they hold, and people who know the difference and perpetuate it as politicians do.
If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North
Stranger: Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves.
That is so romantic.
Capital Pumper: Stranger: Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves. That is so romantic.
Thank you.
Start defooing as soon as possible!
i think youre overreacting a bit. remember, by that definition you used to be evil for a long time too!
Evil doesn't exist. Good and Evil are solely in the eye of the beholder; one man's evil is another man's good.
The evils of statism to you is good to a politician, for example.
TelfordUS: Evil doesn't exist. Good and Evil are solely in the eye of the beholder; one man's evil is another man's good. The evils of statism to you is good to a politician, for example.
A homicidal nut may think he is doing Gods bidding. It doesn't make him less evil.
Statism is a religion.
"It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit and the emperor remains an emperor." ~Dream
The Late Andrew Ryan:I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil? That your mother, father, friends, and associates, despite their many good intentions, support violence and coersion to attain these goals?? I would never associate with a thief, murderer, or parasite but then why should I associate with those who hapilly hand over the means to these criminals? Am I over reacting? How do I deal with this moral paradox and how do you?
People with different ideas regarding legitimate property would disagree with you. Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a community full of people who believe that it is always immoral to violate the NAP, no matter what the circumstances. But anyways, very good and moral people who support statism do exist.
filc: A homicidal nut may think he is doing Gods bidding. It doesn't make him less evil.
But that makes him a good person in his eyes, but an evil one to someone else. See, it's all a matter of different perceptions.
Telford, I'm afraid all you're telling us is that we needn't talk to you about good and evil....
still, anyone who transgresses the NAP does so without justification (since justification would lead to contradiction), and if we can't use the word evil to describe him as someone who transgresses the NAP (because you object to that word, and don't understand it) then lets adopt a new word.
any etymologists out there want to coin us something?
Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid
Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring
nirgrahamUK: Telford, I'm afraid all you're telling us is that we needn't talk to you about good and evil.... still, anyone who transgresses the NAP does so without justification (since justification would lead to contradiction), and if we can't use the word evil to describe him as someone who transgresses the NAP (because you object to that word, and don't understand it) then lets adopt a new word. any etymologists out there want to coin us something?
Well, I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant. Perhaps the trangressing the NAP, to you, is destructive, not evil.
Scott Jefferies:i think youre overreacting a bit. remember, by that definition you used to be evil for a long time too!
TelfordUS: I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant.
well, the words may be irrelevant, but the concepts are not. the NAP - don't break it. you can't justify breaking it.if you do i'm going to call you a made up word. 'evil'
nirgrahamUK: TelfordUS: I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant. well, the words may be irrelevant, but the concepts are not. the NAP - don't break it. you can't justify breaking it.if you do i'm going to call you a made up word. 'evil'
Nono, I'm right there with you! I just had to refute the existence of an evil entity. To both of us, the NAP is destructive to the way we want to live, is it not? Thus destructive is a better word to use.
Eric: The Late Andrew Ryan:I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil? That your mother, father, friends, and associates, despite their many good intentions, support violence and coersion to attain these goals?? I would never associate with a thief, murderer, or parasite but then why should I associate with those who hapilly hand over the means to these criminals? Am I over reacting? How do I deal with this moral paradox and how do you? People with different ideas regarding legitimate property would disagree with you. Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a community full of people who believe that it is always immoral to violate the NAP, no matter what the circumstances. But anyways, very good and moral people who support statism do exist.
ok, but do you believe in 'evil' entities?
Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528
Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119
contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises
Mises.org sitemap