The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

How to handle evil

rated by 0 users
This post has 84 Replies | 11 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,750
The Late Andrew Ryan Posted: Wed, Nov 4 2009 5:29 PM
I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil? That your mother, father, friends, and associates, despite their many good intentions, support violence and coersion to attain these goals?? I would never associate with a thief, murderer, or parasite but then why should I associate with those who hapilly hand over the means to these criminals? Am I over reacting? How do I deal with this moral paradox and how do you?

All the statists and Keynesians will look up and shout "Save Us!" and I'll wisper "No." 

  • | Post Points: 140
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,561
Points 45,315

Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 146
Points 2,245

I can't hold it against them to such a degree when they're ignorant of the alternative. As for people who know about libertarianism and reject it, they will feel my argumentative wrath. :p

I do my best to educate. Usually when a situation comes up that's related to the studies here, such as matters business, economic, government, political, etc...

The appeal to "charity" is a truly ironic one. First, it is hardly "charity" to take wealth by force and hand it over to someone else. -Rothbard

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,690
MVP
SystemAdministrator

The Late Andrew Ryan:
I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil?

They aren't evil.  It is a vicious game when you start to focus on your family and friends, who are largely ignorant of the consequences of the ideas they hold, and people who know the difference and perpetuate it as politicians do.

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 176
Points 3,895

Stranger:

Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves.

That is so romantic.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,561
Points 45,315

Capital Pumper:

Stranger:

Evil has cast a spell on them. You have broken from it, but the fact that they haven't yet doesn't mean they are evil themselves.

That is so romantic.

Thank you.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 1,300
Points 23,510

Start defooing as soon as possible!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 80
Points 1,660

i think youre overreacting a bit. remember, by that definition you used to be evil for a long time too!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 76
Points 2,165

Evil doesn't exist. Good and Evil are solely in the eye of the beholder; one man's evil is another man's good.

The evils of statism to you is good to a politician, for example.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 597
Points 9,495
filc replied on Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:18 PM

TelfordUS:

Evil doesn't exist. Good and Evil are solely in the eye of the beholder; one man's evil is another man's good.

The evils of statism to you is good to a politician, for example.

A homicidal nut may think he is doing Gods bidding. It doesn't make him less evil.

Statism is a religion.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 668
Points 11,745

TelfordUS:

Evil doesn't exist. Good and Evil are solely in the eye of the beholder; one man's evil is another man's good.

The evils of statism to you is good to a politician, for example.

Oh Nietzsche you poet.

"It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit and the emperor remains an emperor." ~Dream

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 127
Points 2,480
Eric replied on Wed, Nov 4 2009 8:22 PM

The Late Andrew Ryan:
I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil? That your mother, father, friends, and associates, despite their many good intentions, support violence and coersion to attain these goals?? I would never associate with a thief, murderer, or parasite but then why should I associate with those who hapilly hand over the means to these criminals? Am I over reacting? How do I deal with this moral paradox and how do you?

People with different ideas regarding legitimate property would disagree with you. Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a community full of people who believe that it is always immoral to violate the NAP, no matter what the circumstances. But anyways, very good and moral people who support statism do exist.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 76
Points 2,165

filc:

A homicidal nut may think he is doing Gods bidding. It doesn't make him less evil.

But that makes him a good person in his eyes, but an evil one to someone else. See, it's all a matter of different perceptions.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,078
Points 65,575
Moderator

Telford, I'm afraid all you're telling us is that we needn't talk to you about good and evil....

still, anyone who transgresses the NAP does so without justification (since justification would lead to contradiction), and if we can't use the word evil to describe him as someone who transgresses the NAP (because you object to that word, and don't understand it) then lets adopt a new word. 

any etymologists out there want to coin us something?

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 76
Points 2,165

nirgrahamUK:

Telford, I'm afraid all you're telling us is that we needn't talk to you about good and evil....

still, anyone who transgresses the NAP does so without justification (since justification would lead to contradiction), and if we can't use the word evil to describe him as someone who transgresses the NAP (because you object to that word, and don't understand it) then lets adopt a new word. 

any etymologists out there want to coin us something?

Well, I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant. Perhaps the trangressing the NAP, to you, is destructive, not evil.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,750
Scott Jefferies:

i think youre overreacting a bit. remember, by that definition you used to be evil for a long time too!

So? I became an anarchist before I was 18, I never voted, I never used any influence or coersive power I had to force people to do things at gunpoint! I studied and researched specifically to determine my political ideology so that I wouldn't do or support anything immoral! Whereas all those around me did little to attempt to find real truth. 90% of people I talk to say that the state is immoral if all the things the state does is said, so long as the term "state" or "country" or "govenment is used in the description but once the term is used they say they would die for it! Even back in my early years I would consider myself immoral, but surly a thief who has returned his loot and given recompence should be forgiven by the reasonable man.

All the statists and Keynesians will look up and shout "Save Us!" and I'll wisper "No." 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,078
Points 65,575
Moderator

TelfordUS:
I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant.

well, the words may be irrelevant, but the concepts are not. the NAP - don't break it. you can't justify breaking it.if you do i'm going to call you a made up word. 'evil'

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 76
Points 2,165

nirgrahamUK:

TelfordUS:
I'm just saying the words "good and evil" are irrelevant.

well, the words may be irrelevant, but the concepts are not. the NAP - don't break it. you can't justify breaking it.if you do i'm going to call you a made up word. 'evil'

Nono, I'm right there with you! I just had to refute the existence of an evil entity. To both of us, the NAP is destructive to the way we want to live, is it not? Thus destructive is a better word to use.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 150
Points 2,750
Eric:

The Late Andrew Ryan:
I've come to realize somthing, and that is that those around me are advocates of evil. It's one thing to realize the horrors of statism, and to begin advocating a society based on perfect liberty and the principals of property and NAP but what do you do that day you wake up and realize that those around you are evil? That your mother, father, friends, and associates, despite their many good intentions, support violence and coersion to attain these goals?? I would never associate with a thief, murderer, or parasite but then why should I associate with those who hapilly hand over the means to these criminals? Am I over reacting? How do I deal with this moral paradox and how do you?

People with different ideas regarding legitimate property would disagree with you. Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a community full of people who believe that it is always immoral to violate the NAP, no matter what the circumstances. But anyways, very good and moral people who support statism do exist.

No. You confuse the terms "good" and nice with "moral". This is my entire problem, those with whom I come into contact with are good, fun, caring, and in their everyday lives very respectable. If this was not the case I would have no problem disconnecting myself with them. You can be nice but still be immoral. Think of a murderer who is polite, respectful, and kind to you but is still plotting the murder of others. This man is nice and kind but still immoral. Those around me are by and large nice people but they advocate force and coersion to attain their ends and I'm having difficulty figuring out how to deal with these people

All the statists and Keynesians will look up and shout "Save Us!" and I'll wisper "No." 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 4,078
Points 65,575
Moderator

ok, but do you believe in 'evil' entities?

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 1 of 5 (85 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap