The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Regulation caused the Recession

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 4 Replies | 3 Followers

Not Ranked
Male
15 Posts
Points 405
garagemc posted on Sun, Oct 25 2009 4:38 AM

Can someone point me to article that analyses how regulation caused the crises/recession? That where it not for this regulation the toxic derivatives would not have been created? 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 200 Contributor
Male
142 Posts
Points 2,120
Suggested by David Sherin

See here for a massive compilation of material on the current global recession: http://mises.org/daily/3128

This is my personal favorite: http://mises.org/daily/3165

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
198 Posts
Points 2,995

Praetyre:

See here for a massive compilation of material on the current global recession: http://mises.org/story/3128

This is my personal favorite: http://mises.org/story/3165

Many thanks for these links!

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
694 Posts
Points 12,250

Although *technically* they are always right when they say more regulation will fix X. More regulation would stop banks from lending out too much cash if you placed a legal limit on how much cash they were allowed to lend out...

The real problem isn't (lack of) regulation, because the free market would regulate itself. For example, uL is a private company that certifies electronics for safe use. No one will stock your electronics if it doesn't pass uL regulations.

The problem with government regulations is that they have no incentive to pass good ones. If the government were any good at regulating nothing bad would ever happen but it does so its not.

Don't let them hijack this ground from you! When people say regulation they always mean more government. You immediately need to point out that government is not the only entity that can regulate. At this point, you can move onto a comparison of incentives between gov and the free market for regulation.

"It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit and the emperor remains an emperor." ~Dream

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
101 Posts
Points 1,670

I look at it this way:

Setting an interest rate at 0% (or -3%) creates an enormous pressure of money into the system.  At those rates you have built-in profit and *not* borrowing is stupid.  Whatever the regulatory road blocks in the way, the pressure is adequate to take the dirt side-roads around them or even construct a brand new highway.  Regulating that sort of pressure is like trying to put your hand in front of a gushing fire hydrant.  Without that pressure of free unlimited money, none of this would be a problem.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap