The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Who shot JFK?

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 14 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
159 Posts
Points 3,490
Fephisto posted on Thu, Aug 6 2009 9:53 PM

I'm surprised this hasn't been asked yet, but on a subforum that says "history" it's a given that this should be asked at least once.

 

So, who shot JFK?  Was it a conspiracy?  Or was it just a guy with a gun and a grudge?  What thoughts do you guys have on the manner?

"Keynesianomics is a Ponzi scheme."

"You are correct in that Capitalism does not help with poverty, because it eliminates poverty altogether..."

"That wonderful strawman:  greed."

Inequality bad. Zip it!Zip it!Zip it!

  • | Post Points: 95

All Replies

Top 10 Contributor
Male
4,669 Posts
Points 81,345

Don't play stupid, we know you did it.

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"

Bob Dylan

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
46 Posts
Points 690

There are too many "coincidences" to believe that it was some lone wacko who hated JFK, as the official state version purports. 

I could go on and on about the JFK assassination. I took a course on it in college. Would love to go on and on, but the quick answers to your question: 

Who shot JFK? I think it does not matter who pulled the actual trigger of the actual gun that did the deed. All I know is that it was not Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone from the 6th floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depositiory. 

Was it a conspiracy? Yes because the legal definition would be satisfied assuming no one person acted alone. As to the makeup of the conspiracy, that is where the rabbit hole begins. 

 

"La cuestión es siempre la misma: que el gobierno o el mercado. No hay tercera solución." -Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
679 Posts
Points 11,830
Answered (Not Verified) Esuric replied on Thu, Aug 6 2009 10:15 PM
Suggested by Esuric

Keynes

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Male
512 Posts
Points 9,510
Suggested by Justin D

I'm more concerned about who ate my KFC.

Whoever it was also ate at  jack ruby teusday's. HAHAHAHAHA

sorry about that.

 Let us look then and see, how they manage their concerns- they for whose cause we are to labor, devote ourselves, and grow enthusiastic

 -Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
392 Posts
Points 5,750

Don't be silly, everybody knows it was Eddy Blake, aka The Comedian. Damn, my love of The Watchmen hit again! Wink

No, just to be serious there are all sorts of rumors out there but the main indication that something is amiss is the weapon. As good as a shot as Harvey Lee Oswaldwas  he could never, and I say never, fire three aimed shots in such a short time with such a piece of junk as an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano. That rifle was so catastrophically bad that Italian troops stationed in Somalia complained continously (and ineffectively) to the High Command in Rome that the local Askaris, having recieved straight pull Mannlichers after WWI (part of the reparations Austria was forced to pay) were armed with a far superior weapon than theirs. So he either had a different weapon that disappeared immediately, he didn't pull the trigger himself three times or something else happened.

 Yes, it's time for the Dr Goebbels show!

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 75 Contributor
410 Posts
Points 8,530

JFK had a huge head, The shots were sprayed around the Limo- one did connect with the president. If it was a conspiracy they would have hired a professional or trained marskman no? So how did this marksman have such a dispersement?

A lot of wackos have attempted to assassinate important people throughout history, but miss their mark, other attempts are successful.  Remember Pope John Paul, how could you not kill him if you had an open shot?  Lee Oswald with a little luck and 3 shots pulled it off

do we get free cheezeburger in socielism?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
68 Posts
Points 1,000
Suggested by hayekianxyz

Kakugo:
No, just to be serious there are all sorts of rumors out there but the main indication that something is amiss is the weapon. As good as a shot as Harvey Lee Oswaldwas  he could never, and I say never, fire three aimed shots in such a short time with such a piece of junk as an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=745248745546892501

I really wish libertarians would give the consipracy theories a rest, especially the most ridiculous ones: JFK and 9/11... thankfully I haven't seen any libertarian disputing the moon landing.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
68 Posts
Points 1,330
solos replied on Fri, Aug 7 2009 4:04 AM

Kakugo:

Don't be silly, everybody knows it was Eddy Blake, aka The Comedian. Damn, my love of The Watchmen hit again! Wink

No, just to be serious there are all sorts of rumors out there but the main indication that something is amiss is the weapon. As good as a shot as Harvey Lee Oswaldwas  he could never, and I say never, fire three aimed shots in such a short time with such a piece of junk as an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano. That rifle was so catastrophically bad that Italian troops stationed in Somalia complained continously (and ineffectively) to the High Command in Rome that the local Askaris, having recieved straight pull Mannlichers after WWI (part of the reparations Austria was forced to pay) were armed with a far superior weapon than theirs. So he either had a different weapon that disappeared immediately, he didn't pull the trigger himself three times or something else happened.

 

Why is it that everyone thinks they're an expert on everything on the Internet?

http://www.ifc.com/videos/new-world-order-clip-2.php

Alex himself got 4-5 shots off in 6 seconds but he completely dismisses it.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
336 Posts
Points 6,185

Everyone knows Kristin Shepard shot J.R. in Dallas and said she was pregnant with his child as a result of their affair.

Wait....

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
513 Posts
Points 8,440
fsk replied on Fri, Aug 7 2009 9:00 AM

"Who shot JFK?" is the wrong question.  "Why was JFK murdered?" is much more interesting.

JFK was trying to eliminate the Federal Reserve.  JFK was trying to end the Vietnam War, because he realized it was a massive scam.  JFK was trying to reduce the power of the FBI and CIA.

JFK was challenging too many established interests.

I have my own blog at FSK's Guide to Reality. Let me know if you like it.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 25 Contributor
Male
1,929 Posts
Points 36,460
Suggested by Praetyre

Who cares?

At most, 5% of the population would need to stop complying to bring down the government.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
392 Posts
Points 5,750
Kakugo replied on Sun, Aug 9 2009 12:26 PM

In my naivete I forgot that gun nuts are perhaps even worse than conspiracy theorists! Big Smile

 Yes, it's time for the Dr Goebbels show!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Male
431 Posts
Points 7,900

fsk:

"Who shot JFK?" is the wrong question.  "Why was JFK murdered?" is much more interesting.

JFK was trying to eliminate the Federal Reserve.  JFK was trying to end the Vietnam War, because he realized it was a massive scam.  JFK was trying to reduce the power of the FBI and CIA.

JFK was challenging too many established interests.

The 'Kennedy was going to end the Vietnam war' is a post-'Camelot' myth created by his left wing idolators.

Semper Fidelis

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
159 Posts
Points 3,490

I don't dwell on this question so much, but...honestly, a small part of me wants to think that George Carlin skit is true.  How when a new President is installed, they take him into a smoke filled room wherein a movie screen shows footage of the Kennedy assassination, but it’s shown from a different angle then the Zapruder film. Then they ask him if he has any questions.

"Keynesianomics is a Ponzi scheme."

"You are correct in that Capitalism does not help with poverty, because it eliminates poverty altogether..."

"That wonderful strawman:  greed."

Inequality bad. Zip it!Zip it!Zip it!

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (15 items) | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap