The Mises Community
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

I want to see Rothbardians defend a puppy getting its ears and tail hacked off

This post has 472 Replies | 24 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 55
Points 1,820
Curlz31 Posted: Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:06 PM

 

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25797913-661,00.html

Now according to Rothbardians this guy cannot be jailed because he "owned" the puppy.

I want to see the frothing-at-the-mouth lunatics try and defend a puppy having its ears and tail hacked off.

Hopefully there will not be many of you because you are a weight on the shoulders of sane libertarians.

 

 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 335
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 410
Points 8,530

lol

do we get free cheezeburger in socielism?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 574
Points 9,290
Moderator
Natalie replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:12 PM

So you're saying jail is the only available method of punishment?

Maybe you also want to arrest all pet owners that sterilize their pets? Or how about the government owned facilities that routinely kill strays?

If I hear not allowed much oftener; said Sam, I'm going to get angry.

J.R.R.Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 2,611
Points 46,210
Stranger replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:14 PM

If you're squeamish about this puppy, don't find out what ranchers do to male calves!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 1,308
Points 23,610
scineram replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:20 PM

lol

Who was the owner?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,500
Points 40,210
Moderator

Are you conflating aesthetics/etiquette and morality, Curlz? Why yes, yes you are. Don't do that again.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 55
Points 1,820
Curlz31 replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:36 PM

Natalie:
Maybe you also want to arrest all pet owners that sterilize their pets?

No. Why would I want to do that? I'm a veterinary student so i'm likely to be doing those procedures myself.

Natalie:
Or how about the government owned facilities that routinely kill strays?

They euthanase strays if they cannot be re-homed. This is preferable to releasing them on the street where they are likely to get hit by cars or starve.

The problem isn't killing. The problem is cruelty. Try and understand the difference.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 55
Points 1,820
Curlz31 replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:38 PM

Knight_of_BAAWA:
Are you conflating aesthetics/etiquette and morality, Curlz? Why yes, yes you are. Don't do that again.

No. I'm saying that when a puppy has it's ears and tail hacked off it causes the puppy to agonise. Hence it is deserving of punishment.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,500
Points 40,210
Moderator

And only jail and fines are punishment, hmmmmm? Is that what you're going to say next?  Because if you are: you're sorely mistaken. And don't give me "well, that just means you think it's ok to do that to a puppy", because it doesn't.

Now that I've cut off your escape routes, I suggest you start thinking about other options. What else can humans do to punish someone?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 679
Points 11,830
Esuric replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:58 PM

Yeah, we libertarians believe that all puppies should be earless... Didn't you know?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,196
Points 88,450
Juan replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:59 PM
They euthanase strays if they cannot be re-homed. This is preferable to releasing them on the street where they are likely to get hit by cars or starve.
Oh my. The animal lover actually believes in the final solution. Sick.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 8:59 PM

I suppose killing a dog isn't cruelty. Btw, should we also jail people who crush ants by stepping on them. crush spiders, or mass-kill termites in home-made gas chambers aka fumigation?

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 55
Points 1,820
Curlz31 replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 9:00 PM

Knight_of_BAAWA:
And only jail and fines are punishment, hmmmmm?

I'm absolutely open to creative punishments. Instead of jail and fines we could cut the guy's ears off with no anaesthetic and put a device around his ankle which shocks him every time he thinks about animal cruelty.

Smile

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 55
Points 1,820
Curlz31 replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 9:04 PM

Daniel:
I suppose killing a dog isn't cruelty. Btw, should we also jail people who crush ants by stepping on them. crush spiders, or mass-kill termites in home-made gas chambers aka fumigation?

No. That would be ridiculous.

If you think cutting off a dog's ears and stepping on an ant is the same thing, you lack common sense.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 2,500
Points 40,210
Moderator

Curlz31:
I'm absolutely open to creative punishments. Instead of jail and fines we could cut the guy's ears off with no anaesthetic and put a device around his ankle which shocks him every time he thinks about animal cruelty.

Smile

Replacing one form of sadism with another is not a very good option, don't you think?

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 679
Points 11,830
Esuric replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 9:06 PM

Curlz31:
I'm absolutely open to creative punishments. Instead of jail and fines we could cut the guy's ears off with no anaesthetic and put a device around his ankle which shocks him every time he thinks about animal cruelty.

Curlz31:
If you think cutting off a dog's ears and stepping on an ant is the same thing, you lack common sense.

True.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,465
Points 24,465
Daniel replied on Fri, Jul 17 2009 9:07 PM

So you favor the mass-killing termites, but not the mass-killing of dogs? If so, why?

My favorite online shop: www.cafepress.com/libertyphile Big Smile

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 439
Points 7,310

the pathos is even more effective if the puppy is blind (for future reference).

for a libertarian response.  I would choose to live in a community where this sort of behavior was contractually forbidden.  the price to pay for breaking certain behaviors (hurting children/animals) would be death.  don't want to sign a contract with a death penalty clause?  live in a different community. 

What is your plan?  a righteous crusade?  Where you violate people's property and privacy to chek if they are mutilating any puppies?  great excuse for a totalitarian state you have there.  think of the children.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 7,643
Points 132,750
MVP
SystemAdministrator

Knight_of_BAAWA:
Replacing one form of sadism with another is not a very good option, don't you think?

Curlz' doublethink is indicative of why nothing changes.  You have people more obsessed with the Rothbardian position on the treatment of monkies, than eugenics and genocide against whole swathes of the human population.

Is it any wonder the statists are winning?

If you find something evil that wobbles, push it. - Gary North

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,809
Points 49,985
Moderator

Buy the dog if you think it is suffering abuse. Certainly you seem to care for it more then the owner.

'It is difficult to imagine any normal person wishing to meet Marx for a third time.' - Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition

  • | Post Points: 50
Page 1 of 24 (473 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » | RSS

Ludwig von Mises Institute | 518 West Magnolia Avenue | Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

Phone: 334.321.2100 · Fax: 334.321.2119

contact@Mises.org | webmaster | AOL-IM MainMises

Mises.org sitemap